Chazore said:
I think it's sad that you seem to think Checker 4k>Native and keep going with it.
We're looking at a multiplat AAA title that two consoles cannot seem to handle at full 1080p 60fps, I believe that is an actual problem to look at rather than ignore and excuse it with res shaming.
You're okay with low res, yet flaunt checker 4k when you can obtain it, I honestly don't know what to say to someone who would change views on the fly like that.
I find that very sad, especially when you have to look down on those who expect better and bring them down to a lwoer level.
|
change views? you must be delusional.
I have never said checker 4k is better than native 4k. I have always been cosnsistent with my narrative that too much power or focus is spent on resolution and how ever higher resolutions shouldnt be the focus of games or hardware. And that if checker 4k is a perfectly ok stop gap to give pseudo 4k gaming at a $399 price point. And also, that the IQ difference between checker 4k will be even less apparent than that between 720p and 1080p.
I'm as ok with checker 4k to native 4k as I am with resolution scaling as opposed to a broken game at 1080p/native rez.
And I'm not looking down on anyone, stop twisting shit to lend your narrative some credence even though it makes zero sense. All I've said or I'm saying is that rez scaling isn't the end of the world and is an effective way to get the most out of the hardware. Ive also said that outside the forums and sites that feed on this the general public honestly can't tell the difference or "know" when their "1080p" game is in fact scaling to a lower rez to maintain framerates. But my saying that somehow means I'm looking down on people that want better?
wtf u talking about?
How can you accuse me of being inconsistent when i am championing resolution scalimg the very same way i was championing checker 4k (if in case you didnt know is also rez scalimg lol). Funny shit.