| Qwark said: but a regular blu ray player can't get a firmware update for UHD movies as they did for 3d blu ray. Bdxl is more expensive than regular blu ray it is simple as that.
|
On PC they have and can, depending on your drive.
| Qwark said: I have never seen Sony using a disc bigger than 50gb and they have tried to get as close to the limit as possible. MS doesn't use them either and especially the halo games have huge first day patches for the SP. Even if the PS4 would be able to read those discs which also means the player needs to be able to read 128mbit as you please per second. On each layer and usually the third layer is slower than the first. But Sony mainly didn't include one because of the costs
|
You aren't looking at the bigger picture.
BDXL allows for more space to be used for higher quality Audio and Video.
The original Playstation didn't use all it's space up for the games themselves. - A stupidly massive portion was used for higher quality Video and Audio, aka. FMV.
Same wen't with the PS3, most evident with Final Fantasy, where the PS3 had full 1080P video whilst the Xbox had highly compressed low-quality stuff.
Of course the spanner in the works is the original Xbox One doesn't support it, so either games will need to ship on two discs, or have one side of the Disc with the BDXL content and the other for Blu Ray or you put all the content the Xbox One can read on the first layer with the higher quality assets on the layers it can't read.
I'm keen to watch and see how things play out.

www.youtube.com/@Pemalite










