By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Ubisoft on NX: “what we have seen is really great”

Miyamotoo on 22 July 2016
GOWTLOZ said:
Goodnightmoon said:

Yout standarts are so high that you decide wether a game is good or not without even playing it at all, very high. SF0 is not a bad game at all, there is a lot of youtubers defending it and there was a lot of good reviews, not only bad, is a divisive game, I liked it, first day the controls felt weird and I understood the bad reviews, but then second day they felt mostly good, third day it was second nature and bad reviews made no sense to me, and that's the only reason SF0 had bad reviews, controls, wich you only need time to get used to, the rest is fine, not brilliant, but far from bad.

Among thos games SF Zero and Lego City are the ones that I have played and SF Zero controls are terrible at least to me because I'm used to much better controls in other shooters, most other shooters in fact, I haven't finished the game but my friend who has it says it took him just four hours to finish so its really short, what I played was also unremarkable in every way. I would say its a bad to mediocre game, not a good game. It also didn't review well and you know it, random youtubers aren't a reliable source.

Lego City had some charm but again I'm used to much better games in the genre, most modern open world games that I've played are better. Even some older ones are.

I don't need to play Hyrule Warriors to know that I dislike Dynasty Warriors gameplay and wouldn't like it either.

I haven't played Fatal Frame V though but for that one I have nothing else to go by other than the poor reviews.

You realise that Lego City inst standard open world game, its Lego game!? And game it's considered for one of best Lego games ever, that is a fact regardless your personal opinion.