selnor said:
|
you will only see PC games that use this and it will fail just like most other pc games in 2006 till now.
Consoles are where the money is at.
selnor said:
|
you will only see PC games that use this and it will fail just like most other pc games in 2006 till now.
Consoles are where the money is at.
selnor said:
|
The PS3 already has some of the technically most impressive games such as Uncharted and Ratchet & Clank: Tools of Destruction, yet such games only scratch the surface of what can be achieved through PS3 specific game engine enhancements.
Consoles are easier to use, no fuss strainght forward and more seamless in usage for many things. It's not only about raw power, but Windows by itself drains a lot potential PC perfomance and games are never optimised to the extend console games are being optimised for the remaining power. Consoles are also about value for money, currently there is even no expensive x86 Windows PC available which provides the equivalent performance potential that the PS3 Cell processor can provide nor do PCs offer a Blu-Ray drive by default at console price points.
The PS3 will get cheaper and slimmer in course of time, the games library will rapidly expand and improve in quality, the Blu-Ray movie library will expand, new services like Home and PlayTV will be launched, this all considerably enhancing the value for money ratio for the PS3. If you understand this then you can understand why the PS2 is still selling pretty well, but the PS3 is now much better specced than the PS2 was for the time the PS2 console launched, much better!
It's too bad there is no forum search, because then the OP would have seen that there were dozens of this EXACT same thread already.
So what do you win if your prefered console sells more than another?
I remember when rol said the ps3 would never reach dream cast numbers, and how soriku said the PS3 would only end up with a little above 5 million consoles by the end of 07 XD

MikeB said:
The PS3 already has some of the technically most impressive games such as Uncharted and Ratchet & Clank: Tools of Destruction Opinion, yet such games only scratch the surface of what can be achieved through PS3 specific game engine enhancements. Opinion Consoles are easier to use, no fuss strainght forward and more seamless in usage for many things. Half-truth It's not only about raw power, but Windows by itself drains a lot potential PC perfomance Half-truth and games are never optimised to the extend console games are being optimised for the remaining power. Lie Consoles are also about value for money Fact, currently there is even no expensive x86 Windows PC available which provides the equivalent performance potential that the PS3 Cell processor can provide Lie nor do PCs offer a Blu-Ray drive by default Fact at console price points. Lie The PS3 will get cheaper Fact and slimmer in course of time Opinion, the games library will rapidly expand Fact and improve in quality Opinion, the Blu-Ray movie library will expand Fact, new services like Home and PlayTV will be launched Fact, this all considerably enhancing the value for money ratio for the PS3 Opinion . If you understand this then you can understand why the PS2 is still selling pretty well Lie, but the PS3 is now much better specced than the PS2 was for the time the PS2 console launched Fact, much better! Opinion |
I've provided a helpful legend with which to read MikeB's post.
Also - $130 BluRay PC drive
Quick to the cat computer….
Inputting info: sega, sony, ps3, dreamcast, spam, eggs, rubber tubing…..
Yes…yes….i see……OMG
The answer is Chuck Norris ?!?!?!?!?1?!!?!?!?!?
wait what was the question?

''Hadouken!''
those n64 numbers you posted via that link are wrong leo-j
in that chart n64 sold 4 mill wordlwide in 3 years
couldn't you have seen that yourself?
''Hadouken!''