By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - PS4 has so many games they don't even all fit into Sony's E3 conference

LudicrousSpeed said:
FloatingWaffles said:

So Sony has all these games, yet all it took was one game from Nintendo to completely dominate E3.

Edit: Not trying to derail the thread or start any fanboy nonsense, i'm just pointing that out since he wanted to compare the games showings from Microsoft and Sony, so I felt that should be mentioned.

The OP compares to Microsoft in a negative way, i dont think bringing Nintendo ibto it is really derailing. People just lose their shit at the idea of one game "winning E3" for a company. Not your fault. 

Thanks. Yeah, OP started this by taking shots at Microsoft and saying how even though they showed everything they had, they still weren't close to Sony when Sony didn't even show all they had. I thought it was ironic how if he's going to play Microsoft in a negative light like that then it should be mentioned that Nintendo got the most E3 buzz with just one game, despite all the games he's bragging that Sony showed and/or didn't show.

There is a big difference between a thread talking about what games Sony didn't show, and a thread talking about how Microsoft stood no chance when Sony didn't even show all the games they had, and he chose the second one.

It's not like I was just bringing in Zelda out of nowhere for no reason. You're like the only person that has gotten this so far. 



Around the Network

I dont know why you have to put MS into it! No surprise though. Lots of people like you doing the same.



Pocky Lover Boy! 

I was hoping that we were going to hear more about the new Hot Shots Golf, since they gave us some info last year. None was given at this E3 though. :(



LordLichtenstein said:
FloatingWaffles said:

Sure thing, buddy.

Dude, an entire fanbase only had one game to talk about.

And haters only had one game to dump their shit on!!! Thankyou guys! 



Pocky Lover Boy! 

I guess Social Media data is the new WMD in the console wars. Lol!



Around the Network
FloatingWaffles said:
LudicrousSpeed said:

The OP compares to Microsoft in a negative way, i dont think bringing Nintendo ibto it is really derailing. People just lose their shit at the idea of one game "winning E3" for a company. Not your fault. 

Thanks. Yeah, OP started this by taking shots at Microsoft and saying how even though they showed everything they had, they still weren't close to Sony when Sony didn't even show all they had. I thought it was ironic how if he's going to play Microsoft in a negative light like that then it should be mentioned that Nintendo got the most E3 buzz with just one game, despite all the games he's bragging that Sony showed and/or didn't show.

There is a big difference between a thread talking about what games Sony didn't show, and a thread talking about how Microsoft stood no chance when Sony didn't even show all the games they had, and he chose the second one.

It's not like I was just bringing in Zelda out of nowhere for no reason. You're like the only person that has gotten this so far. 

No, MS started it by taking shots at Sony talking about they don't have any release dates. They have a plethora of games with release dates. Coming out soon, no less. Hence the thread "PS4 has so many games, they don't fit into the conference".

Sony just decided to show us us new games, rather than games we already knew about. And Spencer shat on them for that. This kind of thread is the appropriate response. 



does everything have to be a competion? This is the fourth PS home console we KNOW they always have more games coming. Even PS3 getting stomped it still had games coming. This shouldnt surprise anyone. Hell I would go so far as to say there might be TOO many games. Ive only had my PS4 since November and my HD is done :(



pbroy said:
This is an American show. So they showcased what the fatties would buy. TGS will be the Japanese niche type games.

Hey now, that's only true of about 66% of us :)

 

Seriously, though, the op could have just posted the list of PS4's games without taking a shot at MS. The list certainly speaks for itself. 



LudicrousSpeed said:
FloatingWaffles said:

So Sony has all these games, yet all it took was one game from Nintendo to completely dominate E3.

Edit: Not trying to derail the thread or start any fanboy nonsense, i'm just pointing that out since he wanted to compare the games showings from Microsoft and Sony, so I felt that should be mentioned.

The OP compares to Microsoft in a negative way, i dont think bringing Nintendo ibto it is really derailing. People just lose their shit at the idea of one game "winning E3" for a company. Not your fault. 

I'm a PS fan through and through and i agree, the jab at xbox wasnt necessary. 



FloatingWaffles said:
LudicrousSpeed said:

The OP compares to Microsoft in a negative way, i dont think bringing Nintendo ibto it is really derailing. People just lose their shit at the idea of one game "winning E3" for a company. Not your fault. 

Thanks. Yeah, OP started this by taking shots at Microsoft and saying how even though they showed everything they had, they still weren't close to Sony when Sony didn't even show all they had. I thought it was ironic how if he's going to play Microsoft in a negative light like that then it should be mentioned that Nintendo got the most E3 buzz with just one game, despite all the games he's bragging that Sony showed and/or didn't show.

There is a big difference between a thread talking about what games Sony didn't show, and a thread talking about how Microsoft stood no chance when Sony didn't even show all the games they had, and he chose the second one.

It's not like I was just bringing in Zelda out of nowhere for no reason. You're like the only person that has gotten this so far. 

You said you wouldn't derail further. Then you keep doing it even after you were advised not not...

And you are using only one metric to say Nintendo won the show with Zelda alone. When you were already shown that GoW had 50% more views on Youtube than Zelda on the official channels, also another company showed the amount of buzz all companies got during E3 and Sony was miles ahead of MS and even more against Nintendo. But you decided yourself to concentrate on a single source to say the OP wants to bash MS while ignoring that Nintendo destroyed then... your narrative is getting tired.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."