By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC - Intel or AMD?

Is there really that much of a difference anyways.




Nintendo still doomed?
Feel free to add me on 3DS or Switch! (PM me if you do ^-^)
Nintendo ID: Mako91                  3DS code: 4167-4543-6089

Around the Network

I would go with an Intel 45nm Processor. Probably a E8400. Cooler, cheaper, faster.



Normally I would say AMD, but with them changing sockets so often I no longer recommend them. My next CPU will be an Intel.



@ kenzo )

uhm the first graph only shows the notebook chips from AMD (Turion) and the second has AMD on top (less seconds = better), so why do you come to the conclusion "intel" ?

@ cool48 )

the intels are better right now (~5% in gaming performance - in encoding/decoding/other applications the AMDs are about at the same level or better than the intels), but I still like the AMDs better, for they use less power

if you plan to use a costly high performance graphics cards you should use an intel to maximize it's performance, but if you use a mid-range card the graphics performance should be virtually the same



Intel, why go with a second rate company



EMULATION is the past.....NOW.......B_E_L_I_E_V_E

 

 


Around the Network
kenzomatic said:

Software design makes a difference so check the software

Look at this http://xtreview.com/review151.ht

 
Thanks, didn't know Intel dual core processors were that much better than the AMDs.

 



epsilon72 said:
Normally I would say AMD, but with them changing sockets so often I no longer recommend them. My next CPU will be an Intel.

 Yes this was also something that I was looking at but Intel hasn't changed in a long time. I hope I won't buy a socket 775 and then they're gonna change on me.



Intel. Thats a no brainer for me.



Brian ZuckerGeneral PR Manager, VGChartzbzucker@vgchartz.com

Digg VGChartz!

Follow VGChartz on Twitter!

Fan VGChartz on Facebook!



"Back off, man. I'm a scientist."

Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable! You are a poor scientist. Especially if you think the moon landing was faked.


ioi + 1
Lafiel said:
@ kenzo )

uhm the first graph only shows the notebook chips from AMD (Turion) and the second has AMD on top (less seconds = better), so why do you come to the conclusion "intel" ?

@ cool48 )

the intels are better right now (~5% in gaming performance - in encoding/decoding/other applications the AMDs are about at the same level or better than the intels), but I still like the AMDs better, for they use less power

if you plan to use a costly high performance graphics cards you should use an intel to maximize it's performance, but if you use a mid-range card the graphics performance should be virtually the same

I came to the conclusion because Intel has the best preformance for the software I use.



"Back off, man. I'm a scientist."

Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable! You are a poor scientist. Especially if you think the moon landing was faked.


ioi + 1