No online play is the biggest turn on. I enjoy this type of games in multiplayer mostly, and I don't have anyone to play with locally.

Besides, they're just making up excuses to add crappy amiibo functionality to their games. Nintendo has fallen into darkness this generation. There's some rays of light every now and then, but they're living in the dark.

Who said that? There's always room for this type of game xD Most games can fit in anytime, as long as it's designed well.

Would that mean both games are fine in that they both have replayability? Though honestly, I dunno if I'd wanna replay the chronicles games. They're a bit too long for me to want to go back and redo them again. That's where the strength in Star Fox lies: it's a good enough length to replay it, try different routes, and try to do a little better than the last play through. O:

I don't disagree. I'm going to wait for this game to release and depending on what I hear, I'll go from there. I'm probably going to wait for the price to come down considering the Amiibo crap.

I don't have a Wii U, but if I did I wouldn't have considered buying this game. 5 hours is the absolute minimum for a game's length for it to be worth $60 and that too only if its incredible. It may have branching paths, but they should have been connected by a hub for you to explore all of them in one playthrough, not starting the game over again to make it replayable.

Also the high scores thing, many people including me don't care much about scores in a level whether in campaign or multiplayer, like in case of MGS or RDR co-op.