I don't give a rats flying anus what this game looks like graphically if it runs like a turd.
I don't give a rats flying anus what this game looks like graphically if it runs like a turd.
ClassicGamingWizzz said:
fallout 4 |
can't say anything about that game (will never play it) is there more?
Edit: to be fair fallout 4 is a game from bethesda many games from them are better purchased after a few months regardless of platform.
| BraLoD said: How can my opinion on a preference matter be factually wrong? There is a big "IMO", there.
|
Parenthesis break the code, so you gotta write IMO again or it isn't valid. 
| BraLoD said: Wut. Poor Wright, has been losing all time to me lately xP |
Learn some coding.
And that's what happens when one is in love. 
They should develop the game according to the consoles not the other way around. That's what every dev does, as every dev could make a game that looks like Uncharted 4 running at 4k60fps if consoles were made totally based on what devs wanted.
A game that looks amazing given the limitations of the platform its on is technically more amazing to me than a game that takes things too far graphically for its own good.
i am hyped for this game , simply because it is not a turn based one , i don't care about how it looks if it run smoothly
If the NX is the premium system we'll see what FFXV can really look like.
Nah, Witcher 3 (the closest valid comparison) really does look better, console versions included. FFXV is a very inconsistent game from a technical standpoint. They focus so much on certain elements like a character's hair or the skin shaders on a monster to the detriment of fundamental stuff like decent terrain or AA. Blaming hardware for a developer's lack of technique, especially when there are already examples outdoing them, is childish.

About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
