10 points lower than the original. For comparision sake, The Wind Waker HD is 90 on Metacritic, 5 points higher than TPHD.

Yeah, I agree with the score. I think WW is a better game, and WWHD is a better remaster, but TPHD is not such a bad remaster as some people claim it is imo. So, yeah, it's fair that TPHD scored lower. I didn't expect more than this, actually.

It may not be a bad remaster, just a dissapointing one, and scores seems to agree to some extent. Past Zelda remasters this gen are scoring 5-6 pts lower than the original one, and this one is already 10 pts lower.

Yeah, that's fair. I think it could be better, but I still think it's a worthy addition to my Zelda collection. At the beginning it seemed like it could be a disaster when it was first shown, so I'm glad that in the end they solved some issues I had with it. Let's wait though, there's only 20 reviews and the score might be lower or higher than this, though I think it won't vary a lot. 

I think we should also acknowledge that the game kind of lower its status with time. When it released it was widely praised (I guess maybe because of the hype) but it's rare to see it being the favourite 3D Zelda games amongs Zelda fans. I personally think that even if I think it's a great game, it's maybe the worst 3D Zelda. 

Trying to put a negative light when there isnt, so typical.

You know why is 5 points below WWHD?

Because Wind Waker has ALWAYS been way better than TP and times gives a better perspective of this. So simple.

OT: 85 is exactly the score I predicted so I'm glad is there.

The Wind Waker (NGC) Metacritic - 96

Twilight Princess (Wii) Metacritic - 95

As always, you don't know what you are talking about.

Oh I know what I'm talking about:

Best 3D Zelda game remastered 10 years later: 90

Worse 3d Zelda game remastered 10 years later: 85

It seems pretty logic to me.

Best and worst accoding to you? Don't go into the subjective route because everyone has a different opinion. For example, TWW is the worst and weakest 3D Zelda ever, yet it manage to get a score in the same vein as OoT3D and MM3D. Why TPHD didn't?

Because TPHD is way worse than WWHD and most reviews point that so they give it a lower score. Logic.

And the 3ds games were remakes not remasters, remakes usually get better scores for obvious reasons.

Again, according to you? Because reviewers disagree. As I mentioned above the scores says otherwise (NGC version is 96 like TWW). So no, you are wrong and again trying to defend Nintendo. If this game scored lower is because it is a dissapointing remaster.