| Roar_Of_War said: I actually agree more with Pavo here. The original Wind Waker is worse than the original Twilight Princess. What was wrong in the original Wind Waker was ABYSMAL. The sailing itself lasted the whole game, unlike TPs tears of light, and the triforce quest made a bad problem with the original EVEN WORSE. It was terrible, it was a complete and total disgraceful problem with the game that kept me from replaying it ever again after the first time. The reason WWHD is scored higher is because...well, despite how bad WW's problems were, it was an easily fixable problem that could be corrected simply by adding the swift sail and cutting down on the triforce quest. TP's issues as a whole were not nearly as bad as WW's, but were more cemented into its design and not easily fixable without an actual remake of the game, rather than a remaster. WWHD is far superior to the original WW, it's not even close. The original WW would've died and scored in the low 80's to high 70's at best, IMO. But WWHD solved the core issue with the original, whereas TPHD needed a bit more love and care in order to fix its problems. The lower score isn't surprising to me at all, but the original TP is still way better than the original WW. WWHD just got exactly the fix that WW needed, while TP didn't with TPHD on near the same level. Wind Waker was not always better than Twilight Princess, and it still isn't. Wind Waker is amazing highs and awful lows, resulting in an average game. Twilight Princess is a good game all throughout with some flaws. It just so happens that WWHD is better than TPHD because WWHD got what it needed more than TPHD. TP>>WW WWHD>TPHD
|
Well said.
