By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - i love giving nintendo my money

 

do you like giving your money to nintendo?

yes 123 53.48%
 
see results 107 46.52%
 
Total:230
0815user said:
how much per year on average?

i honestly have no idea. a lot.



Around the Network
BraLoD said:
PerturbedKitty said:

but BraLoD, i wasn't apologizing for the GS thing or any act that i comitted as angrypoolman for that matter. i was talking about how i was as rubberwhistlehistle. i made a lot of enemies with that account and still feel very regretful for how aggressive of a user i was. that isnt how i want to be at all. 

haha, that cat picture by the way is, in fact, my cat. i took that picture right when i made my original angrypoolman account. it was so adorable that i just had to use it. and it just looks like a troll cat, which pretty accurately represented my original account. i used to share videos of my cat on VGC. so yeah, trust in the cat. 

Start sharing cat videos again xP

hahha maybe i will





PerturbedKitty said:
DonFerrari said:
PerturbedKitty said:
DonFe

s nintendo you tried to push new games and lower GS margins, and you also seen to be sugesting people to buying more nintendo stuff than other brands. So you didn't had the best interest of your customers or boss in mind, just your loyality to a brand.

but what i was doing serves both purposes. it makes nintendo money and makes gamestop money. i was happy to do it.



While it is true that Gamestop push sales of new software because naturally sales of both are needed to keep the gamers stocked with things to buy and sell... if your store has a used copy in stock bought from a customer for €5 and you can sell it for €30 or a copy from your supplier which cost GS €30 to sell for €35 surely you see where the bigger margin is here right? Also keep in mind that used stock is never something that a games store wants to build a stockpile of since it is constantly losing its value, the faster it is resold the higher the margin.





Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

ganoncrotch said:
PerturbedKitty said:

but what i was doing serves both purposes. it makes nintendo money and makes gamestop money. i was happy to do it.



While it is true that Gamestop push sales of new software because naturally sales of both are needed to keep the gamers stocked with things to buy and sell... if your store has a used copy in stock bought from a customer for €5 and you can sell it for €30 or a copy from your supplier which cost GS €30 to sell for €35 surely you see where the bigger margin is here right? Also keep in mind that used stock is never something that a games store wants to build a stockpile of since it is constantly losing its value, the faster it is resold the higher the margin.



well.. thats where pushing used sales for the other two consoles comes into play. thats what i meant when i said i am helping GS. 





PerturbedKitty said:
DonFerrari said:
PerturbedKitty said:

s nintendo you tried to push new games and lower GS margins, and you also seen to be sugesting people to buying more nintendo stuff than other brands. So you didn't had the best interest of your customers or boss in mind, just your loyality to a brand.

but what i was doing serves both purposes. it makes nintendo money and makes gamestop money. i was happy to do it.

When you push new instead of used for Nintendo you aren't helping GS as you say you are.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
DonFerrari said:
PerturbedKitty said:
DonFerrari said:
PerturbedKitty said:

s nintendo you tried to push new games and lower GS margins, and you also seen to be sugesting people to buying more nintendo stuff than other brands. So you didn't had the best interest of your customers or boss in mind, just your loyality to a brand.

but what i was doing serves both purposes. it makes nintendo money and makes gamestop money. i was happy to do it.

When you push new instead of used for Nintendo you aren't helping GS as you say you are.

dot. 

i push used instead of new when it comes to ps3 and 360. ive stated this numerous times.





PerturbedKitty said:
DonFerrari said:
PerturbedKitty said:
DonFe

s nintendo you tried to push new games and lower GS margins, and you also seen to be sugesting people to buying more nintendo stuff than other brands. So you didn't had the best interest of your customers or boss in mind, just your loyality to a brand.

but what i was doing serves both purposes. it makes nintendo money and makes gamestop money. i was happy to do it.



So, you'll damage every other gaming company regardless of the quality of work they put out...





midrange said:
PerturbedKitty said:

but what i was doing serves both purposes. it makes nintendo money and makes gamestop money. i was happy to do it.



So, you'll damage every other gaming company regardless of the quality of work they put out...



if they put quality work on a nintendo platform, then id help them, sure. ive done this with titles such as deblob, no more heroes, madworld, etc. all they have to do is publish it on a nintendo system.





PerturbedKitty said:
DonFerrari said:
PerturbedKitty said:

but what i was doing serves both purposes. it makes nintendo money and makes gamestop money. i was happy to do it.

When you push new instead of used for Nintendo you aren't helping GS as you say you are.

dot. 

i push used instead of new when it comes to ps3 and 360. ive stated this numerous times.

Curiously enough you don't see any reason why we think your are damaging others?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

PerturbedKitty said:
DonFerrari said:
PerturbedKitty said:
DonFerrari said:
PerturbedKitty said:

s nintendo you tried to push new games and lower GS margins, and you also seen to be sugesting people to buying more nintendo stuff than other brands. So you didn't had the best interest of your customers or boss in mind, just your loyality to a brand.

but what i was doing serves both purposes. it makes nintendo money and makes gamestop money. i was happy to do it.

When you push new instead of used for Nintendo you aren't helping GS as you say you are.

dot. 

i push used instead of new when it comes to ps3 and 360. ive stated this numerous times.



Not suggesting success with either campaign of yours here, but even if you were to be doing both sides successfully, increasing margin with one side of the business while decreasing it on the other doesn't make you a good employee of gamestop, you're still costing them money from the bottomline in what you are suggesting you did.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive