By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - I predict NX will have full 480p on Handheld and Full 1080p60fps on Home Console.

 

Do you agree with me?

Yes 60 25.00%
 
No 123 51.25%
 
I don't know 34 14.17%
 
I don't care about resolution. 23 9.58%
 
Total:240
Miyamotoo on 07 January 2016
Lauster said:
Miyamotoo said:

"It's also an audiovisual wonder: the most beautiful game of the new hardware generation to date, a game that lights up your synapses as it laughs off the Wii U's horsepower deficit in a riot of colour, brilliant animation and blistering performance; a game that evokes the dazzling, long-lost wow factor of the arcade."

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-12-31-eurogamers-game-of-the-year-2014

Game in motion and live looks much better than it does on screenshots, on screenshots looks bad. Game definitely isn't technical marvel, but even with lack of AA looks beautiful, and thats why Eurogamer said that is most beautiful game of the new hardware generation to date (look date of article).

 Yes, end of 2014... so, a little obsolete now, MK8 is beautiful, but no longer the most beautiful of this hardware generation.

I think that expecting too much from NX is the best way to be disappointed when it will be revealed.

Of Course, but my point was that Nintendo made beautiful games on Wii U even compared with PS1/X1 games that have much stronger hardware than Wii U.





Around the Network
Thunderbird77 on 07 January 2016
Miyamotoo said:
Thunderbird77 said:
Miyamotoo said:

Of Course not, just they usually using art styles for their game that doesn't requires strong hardware in order to look beautiful. Imagine what they will achieve with much stronger hardware than Wii U, even strong like X1.

Nintendo games are pushing the graphics of their own consoles. I can imagine what they will do with much stronger hardware but x1 or ps4 power wouldn't be much stronger.

How so? X1 is around 4x stronger than Wii U, PS4 is around 6x time stronger.

Official specs were never given but it's obvious the difference is not that big.





Miyamotoo on 07 January 2016
Thunderbird77 said:
Miyamotoo said:
Thunderbird77 said:
Miyamotoo said:

Of Course not, just they usually using art styles for their game that doesn't requires strong hardware in order to look beautiful. Imagine what they will achieve with much stronger hardware than Wii U, even strong like X1.

Nintendo games are pushing the graphics of their own consoles. I can imagine what they will do with much stronger hardware but x1 or ps4 power wouldn't be much stronger.

How so? X1 is around 4x stronger than Wii U, PS4 is around 6x time stronger.

Official specs were never given but it's obvious the difference is not that big.

There is no need for official specs when people tear apart Wii U and identify specs itself.

-PS4 and X1 have 8GB of RAM where devolpers can use 5-6GB RAM. Wii U has 2GB of RAM which is slower than those at X1 and where develpers can use 1GB of RAM.

-PS4 and X1 have AMD x86 8-core CPU that runs on 1.6/1.7GHz. Wii U has Tri-Core PowerPC CPU that runs on 1GHz, basicly improved Wii CPU.

-PS4 and X1 have GPU with 1.84/1.31 TeraFLOPS/s. Wii U has GPU with 0.352 TeraFLOPS/s (maybe even 0.176 TeraFLOPS/s.).

Actually Wii U hardware is around 4-5x weaker than X1, add that gamepad is also using some of that power.

 

 





Thunderbird77 on 07 January 2016
Miyamotoo said:
Thunderbird77 said:

Official specs were never given but it's obvious the difference is not that big.

There is no need for official specs when people tear apart Wii U and identify specs itself.

-PS4 and X1 have 8GB of RAM where devolpers can use 5-6GB RAM. Wii U has 2GB of RAM which is slower than those at X1 and where develpers can use 1GB of RAM.

-PS4 and X1 have AMD x86 8-core CPU that runs on 1.6/1.7GHz. Wii U has Tri-Core PowerPC CPU that runs on 1GHz, basicly improved Wii CPU.

-PS4 and X1 have GPU with 1.84/1.31 TeraFLOPS/s. Wii U has GPU with 0.352 TeraFLOPS/s (maybe even 0.176 TeraFLOPS/s.).

Actually Wii U hardware is around 4-5x weaker than X1, add that gamepad is also using some of that power.

 

 

Nobody identified Wii U's gpu specs. We know about ram memory and cpu. By the way, calling the cpu "an improved wii cpu" doesn't say anything. how improved? vastly. like windows 7 was an improvement over windows 95.





Miyamotoo on 07 January 2016
Thunderbird77 said:
Miyamotoo said:

There is no need for official specs when people tear apart Wii U and identify specs itself.

-PS4 and X1 have 8GB of RAM where devolpers can use 5-6GB RAM. Wii U has 2GB of RAM which is slower than those at X1 and where develpers can use 1GB of RAM.

-PS4 and X1 have AMD x86 8-core CPU that runs on 1.6/1.7GHz. Wii U has Tri-Core PowerPC CPU that runs on 1GHz, basicly improved Wii CPU.

-PS4 and X1 have GPU with 1.84/1.31 TeraFLOPS/s. Wii U has GPU with 0.352 TeraFLOPS/s (maybe even 0.176 TeraFLOPS/s.).

Actually Wii U hardware is around 4-5x weaker than X1, add that gamepad is also using some of that power.

 

 

Nobody identified Wii U's gpu specs. We know about ram memory and cpu. By the way, calling the cpu "an improved wii cpu" doesn't say anything. how improved? vastly. like windows 7 was an improvement over windows 95.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=511628

Improved CPU is saying that is far more older arhitecture than new x86 8-core AMD CPU. Tri Core 1GHz vs x86 8-core 1.7GHz.