It would be hilarious if those games were released at the N64 era with the Seal of Quality.

There very much IS fatigue going on here.  I'll defend TFH to quite an extent, but the fact of the matter is they're producing at twice the rate they used to.  They have NOT been doing this until 2011.  Look at the releases:

2010: Nothing

2009: One release

2008: Nothing

2007: Two releases (I'm counting Link's Crossbow Training 10/10 best game)

2006: One (albeit cross-gen) release

2005: Nothing

2004: A landmark year at the time with four releases (two of which were straight remakes without any HD bells/whistles, but let's count them anyway)

2003: Three releases (if we count the Collector's Edition rerelease as a separate release, at least - it's normally bunched with Master Quest in this sort of discussion)

You have to go back at least seven years to match their output in the last five, and that's assuming we count every physical release as one entry (meaning Four Swords Anniversary gets snubbed here).  The key difference is a LOT more work is going into this series now than before.  This used to be one team split up into two subgroups effectively (Capcom notwithstanding with MC as the delayed outcome of the Oracle series contract); now it's six different studios, at least half of which are third party/unaffiliated companies.

I love a good chunk of SS, I loved WWHD, I loved MM3D, I'm sure I'd enjoy OoT3D if it weren't expensive as hell, I'd enjoy HW if I picked it up and had the time to play it, I like LBW and TFH.  I enjoy all of the games they're outputting right now, but that doesn't mean we're not in a bit of Zelda overload here.  It's good to see Nintendo embrace third party assistance, but you can't rightfully say all's fine and dandy when Grezzo is responsible for the best 3DS game of 2015, and it's a remake, or when Nintendo gives Tantalus of all studios the port job for TP, or when they think of a concept so shallow they need to make Link dress up for replayability.  I'm sorry, it's just not true.  They made a goddamn Musou game for Zelda - that's when you KNOW they're taking things too far.  Thank god it was one of the best Musous ever made, but that's besides the point; they're well on their way to whoring the franchise when they take that leap.  It's even more of a worry, logistically, when we've had three new Zelda games this gen thus far, one of which started as a remake, one of which is a spinoff OF that former-remake, and one of which is - again - a Musou game.  Three of NINE (Zelda U notwithstanding right now, although I am counting FS Anniversary) this gen are technically new ideas.  For a franchise entering it's 30th year, it's great that we have new ideas at all, you can argue that all you want and I won't disagree, but Zelda was always held to this higher standard compared to Mario, not something you throw together haphazardly because you need to pad your lineup.  Thankfully LBW was in GotY talks (mostly because nostalgia IMO but hey, it was in talks!), so we've had something to flaunt to show the gen wasn't a complete waste of time for new content.  For long-time Zelda fans like me, I'm glad we've had three and soon to be four definitive versions of classic games come this gen, don't get me wrong, but when I can buy more Zelda annually than most gamers buy CoD or Battlefield or whichever annual shooter you prefer, it's a damn problem whether we want to admit it or not.

Shouldn't have done that. Both Majora's Mask and Spirit Tracks are great games, way better than their predecessors if I do say so myself. If anything, technically you should have skipped Twilight Princess, because it was built upon the engine of The Wind Waker.