By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - I'm not getting Xenoblade Chronicles X because it's too confusing.

bigtakilla on 30 November 2015
illdill1987 said:
bigtakilla said:


I wouldn't be so sure he beat the game. Many others said they have put in 80ish hours and haven't beaten the game.

In fact, from the Gamespot review. "After 65 hours doggedly chasing the next best thing in X, I felt like I had only scratched the surface, with game's the biggest challenges still ahead of me."

So no, the game wasn't beaten by the reviewer in 65 hours. I just want you to be fully prepared for what you are going to get into. It has been said many times by many reviewers, X is simply not a game you can rush through.


He beat the game. No reviewer can review a game at a reputable site like gamespot without beating the game. He even talks about the dragged out story. I just want you to know that he beat the game lol. People who spent 80 hours and have not beat the game probably are doing side missions and exploring and leveling up.

Lol, tell me where he says he has beat the game? Nowhere. If you think you can beat it in 65 hours, good luck. Even in the site How Long To Beat, the fastest recorded time is 75 hours.

http://howlongtobeat.com/game.php?id=21287

Either he is a God at this game, or he didn't beat it. 



Around the Network
illdill1987 on 30 November 2015
bigtakilla said:
illdill1987 said:


He beat the game. No reviewer can review a game at a reputable site like gamespot without beating the game. He even talks about the dragged out story. I just want you to know that he beat the game lol. People who spent 80 hours and have not beat the game probably are doing side missions and exploring and leveling up.

Lol, tell me where he says he has beat the game? Nowhere. If you think you can beat it in 65 hours, good luck.


Dude... Honestly you have no idea how reviews work... Do people watch 80% of a movie and then review it? No.. Come on man he obviously beat the game or he would not review it. Stop arguing when you know you are wrong.



bigtakilla on 30 November 2015
illdill1987 said:
bigtakilla said:

Lol, tell me where he says he has beat the game? Nowhere. If you think you can beat it in 65 hours, good luck.


Dude... Honestly you have no idea how reviews work... Do people watch 80% of a movie and then review it? No.. Come on man he obviously beat the game or he would not review it. Stop arguing when you know you are wrong.

You got it, could you do me a favor though, and when you beat it post the picture of the time of completion.



Nem on 30 November 2015

If you ever played WoW before, its not more confusing than that in terms of stats.

With that said, there are a whole lot of systems, but in essence the game is simply about exploring and doing quests.



illdill1987 on 30 November 2015
bigtakilla said:
illdill1987 said:


Dude... Honestly you have no idea how reviews work... Do people watch 80% of a movie and then review it? No.. Come on man he obviously beat the game or he would not review it. Stop arguing when you know you are wrong.

You got it, could you do me a favor though, and when you beat it post the picture of the time of completion.


Absolutely. But you gotta realize that I might be way worse at games than someone who plays them for a living. So might take me longer.



Around the Network
bigtakilla on 30 November 2015
illdill1987 said:
bigtakilla said:

You got it, could you do me a favor though, and when you beat it post the picture of the time of completion.


Absolutely. But you gotta realize that I might be way worse at games than someone who plays them for a living. So might take me longer.

Right on.



Nautilus on 30 November 2015
illdill1987 said:
bigtakilla said:


I wouldn't be so sure he beat the game. Many others said they have put in 80ish hours and haven't beaten the game.

In fact, from the Gamespot review. "After 65 hours doggedly chasing the next best thing in X, I felt like I had only scratched the surface, with game's the biggest challenges still ahead of me."

So no, the game wasn't beaten by the reviewer in 65 hours. I just want you to be fully prepared for what you are going to get into. It has been said many times by many reviewers, X is simply not a game you can rush through.


He beat the game. No reviewer can review a game at a reputable site like gamespot without beating the game. He even talks about the dragged out story. I just want you to know that he beat the game lol. People who spent 80 hours and have not beat the game probably are doing side missions and exploring and leveling up.

Its not uncommon to reviewers to write a review from a game they havnt 100% finished(story, not complete everything) when the game is too big.Jimquisition made the review for XCX without finishing the game for example.And he says that in the review, in case you doubt me.And Im not sure where it was, but i saw someone posting that to finish the game it takes roughly 74 hours.And thats doing just the essential.So if he played 65 hours, its very likely he didnt finish the game



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1

illdill1987 on 30 November 2015
Nautilus said:
illdill1987 said:


He beat the game. No reviewer can review a game at a reputable site like gamespot without beating the game. He even talks about the dragged out story. I just want you to know that he beat the game lol. People who spent 80 hours and have not beat the game probably are doing side missions and exploring and leveling up.

Its not uncommon to reviewers to write a review from a game they havnt 100% finished(story, not complete everything) when the game is too big.Jimquisition made the review for XCX without finishing the game for example.And he says that in the review, in case you doubt me.And Im not sure where it was, but i saw someone posting that to finish the game it takes roughly 74 hours.And thats doing just the essential.So if he played 65 hours, its very likely he didnt finish the game


Jimquisition?... Never heard of him. For good reason, he reviews games before he beats them. Gamespot, IGN and Gametrailers any mainstream site like that makes their reviewers finish games before they review them.



Pavolink on 30 November 2015

I'm also scared but I'll try. In this age I can just go on the internet.

BTW, I like your threads.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Nautilus on 30 November 2015
illdill1987 said:
Nautilus said:

Its not uncommon to reviewers to write a review from a game they havnt 100% finished(story, not complete everything) when the game is too big.Jimquisition made the review for XCX without finishing the game for example.And he says that in the review, in case you doubt me.And Im not sure where it was, but i saw someone posting that to finish the game it takes roughly 74 hours.And thats doing just the essential.So if he played 65 hours, its very likely he didnt finish the game


Jimquisition?... Never heard of him. For good reason, he reviews games before he beats them. Gamespot, IGN and Gametrailers any mainstream site like that makes their reviewers finish games before they review them.

So that is not much different than reviews in progress that IGN loves to do?

 

Jimquisition is very well known.And your willingness to bash on someones work which you know nothing about, and didnt even read the review to see if he has a valid reason to do what he did, says lots about you.Im wasting my breath here.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1