Umn no, motion blurt doesn't save me money, that sounds completely nonsensical and misinformed, especially for someone who claims they don't get the hate and then goes to slander AF and general AA over motion blur. I am the type that finds motion blur incredibly off putting and non realistic, I find it disorientates my eyes a lot of the time and gives me a slight motion sickness feeling along with it actually hampering my frames than giving me a ton more like you boldly claim.
To add before you reply like you;ve already done before, no I don't get over motion sickness by adapting to the very thing that causes it, I don't work that way either.
Also why the thread to pit it "good for console gamers, dunno why the PC crowd be hatin, lets focus on that crowd instead" type thread.
Also I find Depth of field annoying as well since it heavily blurs a lot of the background image out and my eyes just don't work like that at all. In fact for almost any game I turn off DoF, Motion blur, Chromatic Aberration, Film grain and in recent good ports like Dying Light, turning off those fx permanently actually gained me more frames than having them all turned on. Chromatic Aberration is ugly as sin though for games, it works well for some other forms of media and photography but definitely not games.
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.