By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Nintendo made potato-chan a midget [Xenoblade X censorship]

Naum said:
If you are upset by this you need to seek help..

This...

 

Because at a part you are right, unless you are also 13yo



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Around the Network

This girl is supposed to be 13 right? Even the "censored" outfit is inappropriate for a girl her age...



spurgeonryan said:
Now what will I fap to?


Hopefully not to pictures of half naked underage video game girls....



gergroy said:
spurgeonryan said:
Now what will I fap to?


Hopefully not to pictures of half naked underage video game girls....

Why?



Would have preferred there be an option for people to dress their characters as they wish for whatever reason.



Around the Network

The underwear thing was stupid anyway... I prefer the edited version tbh; what is with Japan's obsession with scantily clad, underage girls?

I suppose there's not much of a feminist presence in Japan for nintendo to fear.



KLAMarine said:
Would have preferred there be an option for people to dress their characters as they wish for whatever reason.

This option is there - every piece of equipment changes the apearance of every character. Therefore from the screenshot provided it is impossible to say wheter or not the game is censored at all. Also the camera might just be zoomed in.



archer9234 said:
97alexk said:
archer9234 said:
97alexk said:
archer9234 said:
97alexk said:
Goodnightmoon said:

In the moment when to cover a little bit of a 13 year old girl body is called "censorship" and a reason for backlash, you know there is something really fucked up with gaming comunity.

THIS so much this. It feels like people have gotten so anti-censorship its going tooo far in the other direction.

Well. You do dumb decisons in other areas. The dumbness starts to spread.

thats not how it works

Yeah it does. Companies keep doing stupid things like the censorship in the M rated fatal frame. Which is dumb. Eventually, the people hating the censorship, will now hate all forms of alterations in a game, owned by Nintendo, weather it's reasonable or not.

hating on this censorship is preatty stupid.and saying ''reasonable or not'' doesnt make your case stronger

Why is hating on censorship pretty stupid? It can be negative or positive. It's valid critisim. I belive this change is valid. But could of been handled better. During the design phase of the game. And not allow it to begin with. A bikini isn't confusing why it was blocked. Over say in Pokemon BW. Gym leader Lenora's appearance.

At the end of the day. This game is being released world wide. It's a waste, to waste your time censoring it, at this stage. VS shooting it down at the build stage of the game. Were no one would even have known. The most money ends up being foreign sales, anyway.  Fatal Frame is an example of it being implimented stupidly. Same goes for Saints Row IV release in Austrialia. It's stupid for the facts of them being M rated games. Were things that can be offensive and not apporite should be allowed. Because of the age the audiance it's going for. VS this game. That is gonna be aiming for a Teen rating. If this was left it. It would of msot likley forced the game to be M rated.

I said ''ON THIS censorship'' meaning going against this censorship and complaning is preatty stupid. Because it depects a minor oversexulised. Personally i dont care for oversexulised stuff at all, sometimes i even like it and im against most censorship but i can fully understand Nintendo's decision to censor it this time, because the character is 15, and even with the censorship she has some revealing clothes, and elma is still sexualised in the western version, so hope that can satisfy your needs :)



97alexk said:
archer9234 said:
97alexk said:
archer9234 said:
97alexk said:
archer9234 said:
97alexk said:
Goodnightmoon said:

In the moment when to cover a little bit of a 13 year old girl body is called "censorship" and a reason for backlash, you know there is something really fucked up with gaming comunity.

THIS so much this. It feels like people have gotten so anti-censorship its going tooo far in the other direction.

Well. You do dumb decisons in other areas. The dumbness starts to spread.

thats not how it works

Yeah it does. Companies keep doing stupid things like the censorship in the M rated fatal frame. Which is dumb. Eventually, the people hating the censorship, will now hate all forms of alterations in a game, owned by Nintendo, weather it's reasonable or not.

hating on this censorship is preatty stupid.and saying ''reasonable or not'' doesnt make your case stronger

Why is hating on censorship pretty stupid? It can be negative or positive. It's valid critisim. I belive this change is valid. But could of been handled better. During the design phase of the game. And not allow it to begin with. A bikini isn't confusing why it was blocked. Over say in Pokemon BW. Gym leader Lenora's appearance.

At the end of the day. This game is being released world wide. It's a waste, to waste your time censoring it, at this stage. VS shooting it down at the build stage of the game. Were no one would even have known. The most money ends up being foreign sales, anyway.  Fatal Frame is an example of it being implimented stupidly. Same goes for Saints Row IV release in Austrialia. It's stupid for the facts of them being M rated games. Were things that can be offensive and not apporite should be allowed. Because of the age the audiance it's going for. VS this game. That is gonna be aiming for a Teen rating. If this was left it. It would of msot likley forced the game to be M rated.

I said ''ON THIS censorship'' meaning going against this censorship and complaning is preatty stupid. Because it depects a minor oversexulised. Personally i dont care for oversexulised stuff at all, sometimes i even like it and im against most censorship but i can fully understand Nintendo's decision to censor it this time, because the character is 15, and even with the censorship she has some revealing clothes, and elma is still sexualised in the western version, so hope that can satisfy your needs :)

My argument still stands. Weather it's this subject or anoher one.



Whatever is just a custom