no, and think of the consumers instead.
These big companys are swimming in money and the market place for gameing is fine as is.

"But after the outrage and negative feedback from gamers regarding the Xbox One, Sony quietly reversed its policies, finally revealing at E3 that the PS4 will not feature used game DRM. This is according to none other than SCE Worldwide Studios president Shuhei Yoshida, who admitted the policy change in a recent interview with Japanese publication Famitsu.

Sony deliberately kept their cards close tot heir chests, and waited for Microsoft to be the first to announced a used game policy and price. Then Sony had the freedom to adjust. When Sony revealed a $399 price point and no DRM at E3, it was met with a minute-long applause from the crowd."

http://ps4daily.com/2013/06/sony-changed-playstation-4-drm-policy-after-xbox-one-outrage/

It won't happen. Hasn't happened with games. Hasn't happened with movies. Hasn't happened with music. The law only gives you the right to sell, not the tools, which is up to the platform holders, which they will never give you. There will never be a day where laws force platformers to create a meta marketplace within their own marketplace specifically so that consumers can better excercise their right to resell their digital games, because that's rediculus.

i completely agree. if developers want to keep people from selling their games, they should probably try to focus on making something with replay value.

i'm happy for that kid from who i bought Dead rising 2 special edition with pen and steelcase for 5 bucks so he can reinvest those 5 bucks into a new game..

and for the record, i dont fucking hate sony. as i said to another user in another thread, I have PS 1/2/3 with a combined 250+ games for those systems. I dont have a PS4, will probably get one eventually, I just don't like the way they are currently handling things. same goes for MS. I am allowed to disagree with what they're doing with the PS4 while still liking their earlier products and not hating them as a company.

so you shouldnt be allowed to pay money for something that somebody else bought, and at the price they want to sell it for? that is an interesting set of ethics.

i agree 100% with everything you said here. and still find it amazing that you have people here who think the industry is actually better off without used games. better off for who, exactly? i guess these guys would think it would be better if consoles like the 360 and PS3 were rendered completely useless in two years time. If there were no used market, there would be no place for these consoles besides the dumpster. Unlesss you're emotionally attached to your hardware and you want to keep it on a shelf to look at. Still would have no functional use whatsoever. That is not the kind of future I want for gaming at all. 

some people already do it now, they set up an acount for a single digital game purchase then when they are done sell the acount. Thus "used" digital games.

And loop holes like that will always exist, but there's no way that method will ever become as mainstream as the current used game market is. It's too much convoluted work for too little reward.