MGSV looks great and still hits 60fps. Enough is enough.

Mr_No

Banned

18,407

4942 posts since 11/03/14

Recent Badges:

Hit And Run 15 comments posted on VGChartz news articles.
Happy Birthday Logged in on your birthday.
First Rung Of The Ladder Earned 10,000 gamrPoints
Spreading the Disease Score a total of 50 games in your collection.
A Civilized Man Managed to avoid being banned for 5 years.
It's a Start Bank a Total of 2,000 VG$.

Mr_No on 08 September 2015

TheWPCTraveler said:
Games are more cinematic at 30fps.

:^)

I definitely don't mind that in games like Uncharted. But when it's a game about precision and being tactical like MGS, CoD or Gran Turismo are, 60fps can make a difference.

TheWPCTraveler

Currently Offline

15,030

2767 posts since 13/08/14

Recent Badges:

1st Birthday Has been a VGChartz member for over 1 year.
Leaving Limbo 100 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
7 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 7 years.
11 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 11 years.
10 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 10 years.
So You Came Back For More, Huh? Logged in a second time.

TheWPCTraveler on 08 September 2015

Mr_No said:

TheWPCTraveler said:
Games are more cinematic at 30fps.

:^)

I definitely don't mind that in games like Uncharted. But when it's a game about precision and being tactical like MGS, CoD or Gran Turismo are, 60fps can make a difference.

Hmm, maybe :^) isn't enough.

In all seriousness, though, I'd rather have 30fps with no frame drops than 60fps with framedrops. Well, I'd also prefer 30fps for cutscenes, seeing as they could use the space for other things...

I also don't understand targeting 1080p, since 720p is fine to me, but then again, my TV is a turd, and I'd rather not use it with a highly impressionable brother around...

I WON A BET AGAINST AZUREN! WOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

:3

thatguymarco

Currently Offline

4,022

1234 posts since 26/10/14

Recent Badges:

1st Birthday Has been a VGChartz member for over 1 year.
7 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 7 years.
3 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 3 years.
Open For Business Earned 10 badges.
4 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 4 years.
Site Veteran Has been a VGChartz member for over 5 years.

thatguymarco on 08 September 2015

I agree, gaming companies should open their eyes and realize that you don't need to have top graphics and sacrifice performance to have a game that sells. Granted, this is MGS we're talking about, it was going to sell no matter what, but now that a big, popular franchise like that has proven that is not necessary for AAA tittles to be super pretty and run like shit, more companies should jump on the bandwagon, it could save them some money too, the prettier, the expensive-er.

I'm now filled with determination.

SvennoJ

Currently Offline

119,920

35327 posts since 29/11/10

Recent Badges:

Leaving Limbo 100 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
Open For Business Earned 10 badges.
Freezing Logged in on Christmas day.
The High Flyer Earned 40 badges.
Site Veteran Has been a VGChartz member for over 5 years.
15 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 15 years.

Currently Playing:

The Last of Us (PS3)
Sly Cooper: Thieves in Time (PS3)
Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn (PC)
Outland (PSN)

SvennoJ on 08 September 2015

spemanig said:

Abun said:

If MGS5 did 60fps with better phyics/interactive environment,than I would be impressed.There is not much happening within the game like Batman or The Witcher 3 either,so achieving 60fps is not something special.

There's literally nothing the physics you describe add to the gameplay. Seeing grass move realistically out of the way when you walk by does jack shit to the gameplay and in every occasion 60fps is superior. Both Batman and TW3 would have been better games with 60fps and a less interactive environment.

TW3 would have been better at 30fps too. Doesn't matter if it's 30 or 60, as long as it's stable. Yet without Parkinson's forest TW3 would have lost a lot of it's atmosphere.

DakonBlackblade

Currently Offline

6,788

2061 posts since 20/01/11

Recent Badges:

15 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 15 years.
12 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 12 years.
Breaking Out Managed to avoid being banned for 1 year.
So You Came Back For More, Huh? Logged in a second time.
14 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 14 years.
Site Veteran Has been a VGChartz member for over 5 years.

DakonBlackblade on 08 September 2015

spemanig said:

DakonBlackblade said:

This whole 60/30 fps, 1080p or not 1080p thing is getting very old realy. Was the game good ? Did you enjoy it ? Than screw the fps or the resolution, just have fun.

Nice MGSV achieves 1080p and keeps 60fps, congrats, I dont realy care when the game doesnt do this but is still an awesome game cause at the end of the day its your enjoyment playing the freaking game that matters not its technical aspects.

No offense, but that's the silliest thing I've ever heard. 60fps makes a game objectively better. It literally improves the gameplay. The 60fps initiative will never "get old." That we're still suffering through 30fps garbage just because modern console devs want to think they're working with high end PCs is fucking rediculus.

That almost always true but not always, in some cases it makes 0 difference and in some rare cases faster fps actualy detract from the gameplay. I played Dark Souls 2 on 60 fps and 30 fps, I seriously prefer it at 30 fps. But thats besides the point, my point is that if the package you were given is fun than stop nitpicking, theres a reason why things are at 30fps (be it design constraints or decisions) or not 1080p, ppl arent doing it just to piss gamers.

Danman27

Currently Offline

5,399

1446 posts since 20/11/13

Recent Badges:

1st Birthday Has been a VGChartz member for over 1 year.
3 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 3 years.
7 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 7 years.
Site Veteran Has been a VGChartz member for over 5 years.
Littlest Genocide 1,000 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
2 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 2 years.

Danman27 on 08 September 2015

Yeah, I don't know how they did it. This is arguably the best looking game on next gen, and it still is hitting 60fps. I mean, I can see drops (Quiet going invisible cause the framerate to drop for some reason), but it's still the best looking game I have on ps4, and it's 60fps. Good job Kojima.

Frogger

Currently Offline

78,389

15423 posts since 04/08/13

Recent Badges:

A Civilized Man Managed to avoid being banned for 5 years.
A Free Man Managed to avoid being banned for 2 years.
Watch Your Back! Received 10,000 profile views.
Pon Received 100 wall post comments on gamrConnect.
4 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 4 years.
Don't Forget To Save 10 status updates.

Frogger on 08 September 2015

TheWPCTraveler said:

Hmm, maybe :^) isn't enough.

In all seriousness, though, I'd rather have 30fps with no frame drops than 60fps with framedrops. Well, I'd also prefer 30fps for cutscenes, seeing as they could use the space for other things...

I also don't understand targeting 1080p, since 720p is fine to me, but then again, my TV is a turd, and I'd rather not use it with a highly impressionable brother around...

MGSV is 60fps with effectively no framed drops and runs at 1080p on PS4. Like I said, there are no excuses. Cross gen or not, the game looks fantastic, and actually runs like a game is supposed to.