ethomaz said:
the_dark_lewd said: I'd actually put Kuja as better than Kefka. Sephiroth's definitely the best though, he was genuinely quite a threatening character throughout most of the game. Very unlikely they'll match that. The thing they need to remember is you need to make your villain actually scary. With Sephiroth they succeeded with the trails of blood and Midgar Zolom impaled on a tree. That stuff really helps build the dread. |
Sephiroth did nothing really bad to be fair... he was just a son crying for attention.
|
Two consecutive posts trolling. So I guess you are being sarcastic, or at least I hope so.
As Ajax showed, most people don't even understand what the heck was going on in FF VII. Just because you only get to meet the real Sephiroth in the end shows how powerful he was. And the Nibelheim scenes, the Midgar Zolom impaled, the Temple of the Ancients crazy Cloud scene, the death of Aeris, the scene where Cloud hands the Black Materia to Sephiroth and then the final battle with that freaking song. How the heck can anyone say that Sephiroth was a bad villain? Even if he doesn't show up or do anything in CD 2, it was because the villain there was Shinra that needed to end and be taken care of.
Maybe it is my nostalgia, I guess that counts a lot, but anyone saying that FF VII had a bad story or bad villain just doesn't make any sense. Tastes are tastes. I played FF VI and I cannot remember any special scene with Kefka, I just know that he poisoned a village and became a God since that is what people mostly say. But I enjoyed it a lot, and it had a great story, but nostalgia plays a big part. Unfortunately most famous forums or magazines or gaming sites are from the US, and FF VI came there first than in Europe. So there is this idea that the industry regards FF VI as better and with a better villain than FF VII and so it is considered a fact.