By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Unable to play any other classic jRPG after Chrono Cross

TheBlackNaruto on 20 August 2015
BraLoD said:
TheBlackNaruto said:

No lie if they just announced and do a remake from the ground up, over hauling the graphics and controls while keeping the core gameplay  and battel system the same I would but it even at $60 lol. But I am with you hopefully this will be the gen that they revive it!

Yeah, there are so many great JRPGs that deserves to get a nice current gen treatment.
I'll play Chrono Cross when I can, seems like another great game as well.

Yes definitely give CC a shot it is a great game!



The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...

PSN: StlUzumaki23

Around the Network
97alexk on 20 August 2015
m0ney said:
97alexk said:

wait until you play xenoblade chronicles

I hope to play it one day, but it's a modern jRPG so Chrono Cross will always remain my fav classic. I played Xenoblade Chronicles on PC on Dolphin emulator a bit but got distracted by other games.


ughh emulators, i hate them xD play on a big TV, with the intended controls, its on the WIi U eshop in europ right now, im playing it for the first time now, its AMAZING



rj7766 on 20 August 2015

CC is almost the best...

 

FF6

Xenogears

Then CC

 

Also am i weird that i liked FF7 and 9  but have tried 8 like 5 times and ... i just cant....



contestgamer on 20 August 2015

Tales of Symphonia craps all over it. That's just a relatively recent game the past decade off the top of my head. Going back to the 90's there's maybe a dozen games that crush it.



Xxain on 20 August 2015
contestgamer said:
Tales of Symphonia craps all over it. That's just a relatively recent game the past decade off the top of my head. Going back to the 90's there's maybe a dozen games that crush it.

Hahahahahaha

Tales of Symphonia? Average in every single way. In regards to series and genre.



Around the Network
archer9234 on 20 August 2015

It was an amazing game. It just suffered being called a sequel. But not really being one. To be a true sequel. You really need to stick to the primary characters. Or the original characters/story are used in some way. But if the references are so small. Or hidden. Or covered up in Matrix 2/3 size plot issues. People just consider it as not a continuation. Then the hate roles in. Since now the game is lying to everyone.

It's like what's going on now with Federation Force. All intended purposes, it should be a good game. But since people expect a Metroid a certain way. It will be hated and become shit. I love this game. I played both CT and CC. But many years later. So I didn't developed the hate when people where waiting for CC in 1999/2000. It should be on peoples love lists. But it's Zelda II, for the series. It's too bad Square didn't want to make a 3rd game and go back to the first games story. And then tried to salvage CC later. Nintendo could of stopped making Zelda at 2. But they didn't. And went back to the style of 1.



Xxain on 20 August 2015
archer9234 said:

It was an amazing game. It just suffered being called a sequel. But not really being one. To be a true sequel. You really need to stick to the primary characters. Or the original characters/story are used in some way. But if the references are so small. Or hidden. Or covered up in Matrix 2/3 size plot issues. People just consider it as not a continuation. Then the hate roles in. Since now the game is lying to everyone.

It's like what's going on now with Federation Force. All intended purposes, it should be a good game. But since people expect a Metroid a certain way. It will be hated and become shit. I love this game. I played both CT and CC. But many years later. So I didn't developed the hate when people where waiting for CC in 1999/2000. It should be on peoples love lists. But it's Zelda II, for the series. It's too bad Square didn't want to make a 3rd game and go back to the first games story. And then tried to salvage CC later. Nintendo could of stopped making Zelda at 2. But they didn't. And went back to the style of 1.

Everything in CC relates to CT



archer9234 on 20 August 2015
Xxain said:
archer9234 said:

It was an amazing game. It just suffered being called a sequel. But not really being one. To be a true sequel. You really need to stick to the primary characters. Or the original characters/story are used in some way. But if the references are so small. Or hidden. Or covered up in Matrix 2/3 size plot issues. People just consider it as not a continuation. Then the hate roles in. Since now the game is lying to everyone.

It's like what's going on now with Federation Force. All intended purposes, it should be a good game. But since people expect a Metroid a certain way. It will be hated and become shit. I love this game. I played both CT and CC. But many years later. So I didn't developed the hate when people where waiting for CC in 1999/2000. It should be on peoples love lists. But it's Zelda II, for the series. It's too bad Square didn't want to make a 3rd game and go back to the first games story. And then tried to salvage CC later. Nintendo could of stopped making Zelda at 2. But they didn't. And went back to the style of 1.

Everything in CC relates to CT

Not for people who played the first game. And didn't REALLY get into the story, in detail. From a basic level. It has convoluted nods and connections. IE like Matrix 2 and 3.



Xxain on 20 August 2015
archer9234 said:
Xxain said:
archer9234 said:

It was an amazing game. It just suffered being called a sequel. But not really being one. To be a true sequel. You really need to stick to the primary characters. Or the original characters/story are used in some way. But if the references are so small. Or hidden. Or covered up in Matrix 2/3 size plot issues. People just consider it as not a continuation. Then the hate roles in. Since now the game is lying to everyone.

It's like what's going on now with Federation Force. All intended purposes, it should be a good game. But since people expect a Metroid a certain way. It will be hated and become shit. I love this game. I played both CT and CC. But many years later. So I didn't developed the hate when people where waiting for CC in 1999/2000. It should be on peoples love lists. But it's Zelda II, for the series. It's too bad Square didn't want to make a 3rd game and go back to the first games story. And then tried to salvage CC later. Nintendo could of stopped making Zelda at 2. But they didn't. And went back to the style of 1.

Everything in CC relates to CT

Not for people who played the first game. And didn't REALLY get into the story. From a basic level. It has convoluted nods and connections.

Huh? Its not dependent on if you played first or not. Everything in CC connects to CT. 



archer9234 on 20 August 2015
Xxain said:
archer9234 said:
Xxain said:
archer9234 said:

It was an amazing game. It just suffered being called a sequel. But not really being one. To be a true sequel. You really need to stick to the primary characters. Or the original characters/story are used in some way. But if the references are so small. Or hidden. Or covered up in Matrix 2/3 size plot issues. People just consider it as not a continuation. Then the hate roles in. Since now the game is lying to everyone.

It's like what's going on now with Federation Force. All intended purposes, it should be a good game. But since people expect a Metroid a certain way. It will be hated and become shit. I love this game. I played both CT and CC. But many years later. So I didn't developed the hate when people where waiting for CC in 1999/2000. It should be on peoples love lists. But it's Zelda II, for the series. It's too bad Square didn't want to make a 3rd game and go back to the first games story. And then tried to salvage CC later. Nintendo could of stopped making Zelda at 2. But they didn't. And went back to the style of 1.

Everything in CC relates to CT

Not for people who played the first game. And didn't REALLY get into the story. From a basic level. It has convoluted nods and connections.

Huh? Its not dependent on if you played first or not. Everything in CC connects to CT. 

I didn't say it was dependent. I meant the connections are too burried and convoluted for a lot of people. Which is why people turned on the game. It didn't feel like a sequal. Too much hunting down. Not enough direct explnations. And lack of closer to the first games characters.