By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Metal Gear Solid V: First Review

Aerys said:
Ka-pi96 said:
85%? That's hardly a bad score...


85 % is much less than other MGS, and it's not really the score, but what is said that is worrying, i sum up that.

It's also one review that we don't really know what to base off of from previous reviews. Like we know the Call of duty is always going to be too highly rated on ign for example. We don't know l, this magazine may be more critical than most place. 



Around the Network
Stefan.De.Machtige said:
KLAMarine said:
contestgamer said:

If it's true, and I have no reason to not believe the reviewer than Kojima has royally screwed his fanbase. What a betrayal.

In Kojima's defense, Konami might have sabotaged MGS V's development via its questionable dealings these past months.

How would they sabotage the development if they gave him like 80 million to make it? It seems they overspend instead of underspend.

Just thinking out loud: some of the rumors, if they were true, would have made for a very hostile environment in the workplace regardless of how much money was being thrown into a project.



Danman27 said:
Aerys said:


85 % is much less than other MGS, and it's not really the score, but what is said that is worrying, i sum up that.

It's also one review that we don't really know what to base off of from previous reviews. Like we know the Call of duty is always going to be too highly rated on ign for example. We don't know l, this magazine may be more critical than most place. 


No, this magazine is just crap, who even give A 13 for Devil third, when it won't even deserve a 8.

Only one french site is great for reviews, and it's gamekult.com .

I don't know much about magazine except  Roleplayingame magazine which is great for all rpg/jrpg, and jeuxvideomagazine... something you read while waiting for the next train, only to /facepalm sometime.



Namiirei said:
Danman27 said:

It's also one review that we don't really know what to base off of from previous reviews. Like we know the Call of duty is always going to be too highly rated on ign for example. We don't know l, this magazine may be more critical than most place. 


No, this magazine is just crap, who even give A 13 for Devil third, when it won't even deserve a 8.

Only one french site is great for reviews, and it's gamekult.com .

I don't know much about magazine except  Roleplayingame magazine which is great for all rpg/jrpg, and jeuxvideomagazine... something you read while waiting for the next train, only to /facepalm sometime.


How Could they have reviewed the Devil's third already??



KLAMarine said:
contestgamer said:

If it's true, and I have no reason to not believe the reviewer than Kojima has royally screwed his fanbase. What a betrayal.

In Kojima's defense, Konami might have sabotaged MGS V's development via its questionable dealings these past months.


We do realize that we're talking about an 85% here right? That's still not a bad review. 



Around the Network
Danman27 said:
KLAMarine said:
contestgamer said:

If it's true, and I have no reason to not believe the reviewer than Kojima has royally screwed his fanbase. What a betrayal.

In Kojima's defense, Konami might have sabotaged MGS V's development via its questionable dealings these past months.

We do realize that we're talking about an 85% here right? That's still not a bad review. 

Tell it to the person calling MGS V 'a betrayal'.



Well i'm glad, this game is a masterpiece, bad JVM.

Day one



Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:

 PS4: 17m   XB1: 10m    WiiU: 10m   Vita: 10m

 

Aerys said:
Well i'm glad, this game is a masterpiece, bad JVM.

Day one

They gave it a 17/20...

Some people...

You haven't even played the game yet it's already a masterpiece to you. This is what's wrong with gaming community, they put too much faith in gaming reviews, but when a site dares to give their favorite franchise anything less than a 9+ they go bat shit crazy on the site's comment section. An 8.5/10 is a good score. Do reviewers have to work with a 9-10 scale nowadays to please everybody?



Samus Aran said:
Aerys said:
Well i'm glad, this game is a masterpiece, bad JVM.

Day one

They gave it a 17/20...

Some people...

You haven't even played the game yet it's already a masterpiece to you. This is what's wrong with gaming community, they put too much faith in gaming reviews, but when a site dares to give their favorite franchise anything less than a 9+ they go bat shit crazy on the site's comment section. An 8.5/10 is a good score. Do reviewers have to work with a 9-10 scale nowadays to please everybody?

I'm not talking about the score little boy, sorry if you are one of those you put more attention in the score than what is said in the reviews

This post was moderated - Miguel_Zorro



Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:

 PS4: 17m   XB1: 10m    WiiU: 10m   Vita: 10m

 

Aerys said:
Samus Aran said:
Aerys said:
Well i'm glad, this game is a masterpiece, bad JVM.

Day one

They gave it a 17/20...

Some people...

You haven't even played the game yet it's already a masterpiece to you. This is what's wrong with gaming community, they put too much faith in gaming reviews, but when a site dares to give their favorite franchise anything less than a 9+ they go bat shit crazy on the site's comment section. An 8.5/10 is a good score. Do reviewers have to work with a 9-10 scale nowadays to please everybody?

I'm not talking about the score little boy, sorry if you are one of those you put more attention in the score than what is said in the reviews

Clearly you do pay attention to just the score as the review in the OP said it was a good game. You do know people have different opinions right? Not everyone likes a game the same amount.