By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Did Sony fire all their shots early?

 

Did Sony shoot to early?

YES! 88 16.27%
 
NO. 346 63.96%
 
Cant tell yet.. 63 11.65%
 
See Results 44 8.13%
 
Total:541
asqarkabab said:
No

No??



Around the Network

No. Just no.

MS has ONE conference at Gamescom. Sony has THREE conferences at Paris, TGS and PSX. And for you they have nothing to show there?

Let's talk about the "ammos left". Does MS have another studio with an unannounced game? I don't think so... Sony has a lot of other studios with unannounced games (Santa Monica, Polyphony, Bend, Japan Studio, Quantic Dream, 2nd Naughty Dog team and others). It's pretty obvious that Sony has more ammos left than MS, without even talking about third party (Sony will crush MS thir party wise).



And next year we're going to see a thread just like this one asking if Microsoft used up all their ammo in 2015 just to keep up with Sony's first-party production.



ktay95 said:
asqarkabab said:
No

No??


Yea ms has nothing to counter Sony 

With halo forza etc they will never win against sony with their stable of first parties that are unique and diverse



REQUIESCAT IN PACE

I Hate REMASTERS

I Hate PLAYSTATION PLUS

I think sony has enough games in the pipeline to announce soon...



Around the Network

Cant believe 9 people voted "YES!".

Sony have a entire armory still left, if needed.



DerNebel said:
bananaking21 said:
DerNebel said:

I'm not convinced of ReCore, announced at E3 with a CGI trailer, not at Gamescom and supposed to release next spring? Also it has only just gone into full production around E3 and work on it has only started about 14 months before E3? And now Mighty No.9 is apparently delayed and Inafune is also working on Red Ash? Call me a hater or whatever, but I'm still extremely sceptical about that game, at least if it's really supposed to be a $60 retail title.


mark my words, its not going to be. just like phantum dust. announced with a CGI trailer to try pass it off as an AAA exclusive, when it was really just a small multiplayer game. 

That'd be pretty sleazy, I mean it was announced right after Halo as an "exclusive new first party franchise for X1", the natural assumption in that situation is $60 retail game.

Nothing really sleazy, they did nothing to claim it is a full retail game. The placement in the show should not be used for assuming it.

My guess is that it is the game of the same scale as Mighty No.9, so a decent $20-30 "indie" experience. The other game they showed was Sea of Thieves, and again they just let the people's imagination assume from there, but to me it looks like it will be a Free2Play title.



JRPGfan said:
Cant believe 9 people voted "YES!".

Sony have a entire armory still left, if needed.

I'm convinced that Sony saw how well the PS4 was selling even with the media trying to push a narrative of 'no games' and then allowed ALL of their developers another 6 months or so to polish.



 

The PS5 Exists. 


Burek said:
DerNebel said:

That'd be pretty sleazy, I mean it was announced right after Halo as an "exclusive new first party franchise for X1", the natural assumption in that situation is $60 retail game.

Nothing really sleazy, they did nothing to claim it is a full retail game. The placement in the show should not be used for assuming it.

My guess is that it is the game of the same scale as Mighty No.9, so a decent $20-30 "indie" experience. The other game they showed was Sea of Thieves, and again they just let the people's imagination assume from there, but to me it looks like it will be a Free2Play title.

Maybe it shouldn't be used for that, but it simply is and MS knows that. That's how misleading marketing works, you don't straight up tell a lie, but you instead choose your words and actions carefully as to make people assume something is the case, when actually it isn't.



Xbox360 had so much "ammo" last gen.... You can count them with 2 hands.