WiiU, of course, no doubt about it. The vita has no games.
~Mod Edit~
This post has been moderated.
-Smeags
WiiU, of course, no doubt about it. The vita has no games.
~Mod Edit~
This post has been moderated.
-Smeags
MikeRox said:
|
I wonder why people thinks we should count later downgraded versions of games that are already avalible everywhere else as reasons to buy a 200$ console.
Samus Aran said:
Nintendo Discussion: 35k topics Sony Discussion: 33k topics Gaming Discussion: more Sony talk than Nintendo talk. Let's stick to facts shall we instead of your made up statistics. |
Sony threads commented on since 2015:
711
Nintendo threads commented on since 2015:
1706
Get your facts straight.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.
Samus Aran said:
Yes, but that wouldn't be a smart business move. But the 3DS at least has plenty of games built from the ground up with the 3DS in mind. It's not a HH for Wii ports... A 4% difference for the same game is big on metacritic. And look at those userscores, the people playing these games obviously don't like them as much. |
No, it doesn't appear it was powerful enough. They released the New 3DS for that. ;)
4% is peanuts. When was the last time you played a game on 2 systems and went... Well it was definitely 4% better on this console than that one.
I think you take the specific percentages a bit too seriously. You need to ballpark them more otherwise it will never make any sense. I mean according to Metacritic, DmC is 2% worse on PS4 and XBO, and also worse than the PC, PS3 and 360 versions. How do you quantify that?
Sleeping Dogs is 3% better on PS3 than it is on 360. But the enhanced XBO release is 8% worse than the PS3 version (and almost not considered a good game).
See how stupid this all suddenly sounds?
Goodnightmoon said: Let´s see what Metacritic has to say, just to know what critics around the world thinks about it. |
Tearaway isn't even an exclusive anymore since a better version is coming out on the ps4 and Gravity rush might be heading the same way if the rumors are to be believed lolll
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850
Captain_Yuri said:
Tearaway isn't even an exclusive anymore since a better version is coming out on the ps4 and Gravity rush might be heading the same way if the rumors are to be believed lolll |
Not only that, I just discovered that Velocity is not a retail game, so it doesn´t count by the OP standars.
Goodnightmoon said:
|
Who thinks that? I don't see anyone saying that???
Captain_Yuri said:
Tearaway isn't even an exclusive anymore since a better version is coming out on the ps4 and Gravity rush might be heading the same way if the rumors are to be believed lolll |
Any most of that Nintendo stuff will be on a future Virtual Console. So I guess we might as well remove them from the discussion now as they're clearly won't always remain Wii U exclusive.
MikeRox said:
4% is peanuts. When was the last time you played a game on 2 systems and went... Well it was definitely 4% better on this console than that one. |
The reason why Vita games score so high is because no one but hardcore fansites pay them any attention.
An average of 9 reviews is statistically irrelevant. Way too low of a number to take the score serious. That's how statistics work, the more (reliable) data you collect, the more reliable your research will be.
vivster said:
Sony threads commented on since 2015: 711 Nintendo threads commented on since 2015: 1706 Get your facts straight. |
Now, how many of those threads don't involve Wii U doom sales in anyway?
Nintendo and PC gamer