By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Xenoblade Chronicles X Needs to be on another system

 

Xenoblade Chronicles X on PC

Yes 101 13.76%
 
No 632 86.10%
 
Total:733
DavidKell on 11 April 2015
DavidKell said:
Skullwaker said:

Well, XCX is being advertised/pushed. So are many RPGs. It's not a mainstream genre and understandably so.


I hope they bundle it outside Japan. The mainstream part is true but not true. FF7 sold over 10mill and WRPG sell well. I think there is a little blindness here in the whole market. Make a good game and push it and it can sell. What would happen if Nintendo made this a mainstay of there system like Mario and later kept it packaged with all future system sales. (After it sells alot of course) I think you could build up a series ofgRPG to where it could sell millions easily. But it would take alot of work and a tempory sacrifice.

Will it be done not likely but i seriously think there is alot of potential here unseen.

Actually at times i got quite upset with sony about their treatment of RPG and even Microsoft i think dropped the ball last generation with lost oddyssey.

Everyone sees the the short term not the long term when it comes to RPG.



Around the Network
Nem on 11 April 2015

This can be extended to every first party game.

So... weird to pinpoint it on this game alone.

Just go buy a Wii U.



DavidKell on 11 April 2015
Nem said:

This can be extended to every first party game.

So... weird to pinpoint it on this game alone.

Just go buy a Wii U.


Planning on it. Everytime i see Xenoblade Chronicles X tho I kept on thinking it needs to sell millions more then it'll probaly reach.

Actually most games don't make me consider this nintendo or otherwise. But RPG are the whole reason i play games (most of it Adventure games and platformers are also enjoyed).



MDMAlliance on 11 April 2015
SubiyaCryolite said:
.. Wasn't there a thread recently suggesting that exclusives like Bloodborbe should be experienced by as many people as possible (on other platforms)? The posts here make it clear that no exclusive should go multiplat. Like ever.


Xenoblade Chronicles X is a first party game, not a 3rd party exclusive.  Not at all the same thing as this.



SubiyaCryolite on 11 April 2015
MDMAlliance said:
SubiyaCryolite said:
.. Wasn't there a thread recently suggesting that exclusives like Bloodborbe should be experienced by as many people as possible (on other platforms)? The posts here make it clear that no exclusive should go multiplat. Like ever.


Xenoblade Chronicles X is a first party game, not a 3rd party exclusive.  Not at all the same thing as this.

So 3rd party exclusives are fair game?



I predict that the Wii U will sell a total of 18 million units in its lifetime. 

The NX will be a 900p machine

Around the Network
fleischr on 11 April 2015

Fact : WiiU is cheaper than a gaming PC.

Given that Xenoblade was rereleased on 3DS, XCX will probably re- release on another Nintendo system in the future.



I predict NX launches in 2017 - not 2016

SubiyaCryolite on 11 April 2015
Ka-pi96 said:
MDMAlliance said:

Xenoblade Chronicles X is a first party game, not a 3rd party exclusive.  Not at all the same thing as this.

Bloodborne is first party as well though...

I think his argument is that Nintendo owns Monolith and thus the Xenoblade IP which is a good point. That said I consider Bloodborne to be like Bayonetta and to an extent Street Fighter V. They are all "3rd party exclusives" that were funded by console manufacturers and arguably "would not exist" without the funding.



I predict that the Wii U will sell a total of 18 million units in its lifetime. 

The NX will be a 900p machine

SubiyaCryolite on 11 April 2015
Ka-pi96 said:

Wasn't Bloodborne co-developed by Sony Japan Studio though? More than just funding in that case...

Yes it was. The thing is any kind of exclusive is very important to console manufactures. They should never become multiplat because 1. It hurts the consoles and 2. without exclusives console wars wouldnt exist. Without exclusive certain consoles would be completely redundant. I just brought this up because the "Bloodborne to a wider audience" thread got a comletely different reaction. Some posters entertained the idea of everyone should experience game X even though we all know it'll never work that way. 



I predict that the Wii U will sell a total of 18 million units in its lifetime. 

The NX will be a 900p machine

veritaz on 11 April 2015
SubiyaCryolite said:
Ka-pi96 said:

Wasn't Bloodborne co-developed by Sony Japan Studio though? More than just funding in that case...

Yes it was. The thing is any kind of exclusive is very important to console manufactures. They should never become multiplat because 1. It hurts the consoles and 2. without exclusives console wars wouldnt exist. Without exclusive certain consoles would be completely redundant. I just brought this up because the "Bloodborne to a wider audience" thread got a comletely different reaction. Some posters entertained the idea of everyone should experience game X even though we all know it'll never work that way. 

If everyone wants to experience it than buy a PS4. No one is entitled to play any game and I see that attitude so much lately from entitled gamers. 



MDMAlliance on 11 April 2015
Ka-pi96 said:
MDMAlliance said:


Xenoblade Chronicles X is a first party game, not a 3rd party exclusive.  Not at all the same thing as this.

Bloodborne is first party as well though...

Bloodborne isn't a first party to my knowledge, but my point was more to this point: "The posts here make it clear that no exclusive should go multiplat. Like ever."