They should buy/finish/release Duke Nukem Forever as a Wii exclusive.
They should buy/finish/release Duke Nukem Forever as a Wii exclusive.
They should recreate the virtual boy as a home system in full color + motion controls.
StarcraftManiac said:
Is Shinji Mikami on Platinum games?!... Otherwise: Nintendo don't buy! |
Yip he is part of them he left capcom.
Resident_Hazard said:
Nintendo isn't larger than Sony, that's absurd. |
It's true last year around june or july it was announced Nintendo has more market share than sony and is now one of the top Japanese companies.
http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSTKV00351520070625?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0
Also remember Nintendo has a generous ownership an Anime company the Seatle Mariners Baseball team and the NBA Atlanta Hawks.
Rath said:
Nintendo is both more valuable (anymore? I don't know actually but they certainly were) and more profitable than Sony. They have smaller revenue and less employees but thats not really what matters. Nintendo is a little bit similar to Google, both reasonably small, very focused on a single sector and amazingly profitable. |
Being as this is only a guess, so no one say I said it was a fact. But I imagine Sony has a lot more money in fixed assets than Nintendo. Remember, revenue is not the only source of money a company has. As a whole I imagine Sony is worth a lot more than Nintendo.
Yes
What? You meant something like "take the money and run" about Reggie?
Ohhh, sure, then i missed the joke... but maybe because it was not really such an obvious one... sorry... once again... :)
If you want, i may tell you a joke in french: maybe it will make you laugh, and forget about my poor english skills?
But yes, chances are, it will be a (total) waste... you'll never know what you're missing... :)

"A beautiful drawing in 480i will stay beautiful forever...
and an ugly drawing in 1080p will stay ugly forever..."
| The Ghost of RubangB said: They should buy/finish/release Duke Nukem Forever as a Wii exclusive. |
QFT finally a good answer.
ion-storm said:
Being as this is only a guess, so no one say I said it was a fact. But I imagine Sony has a lot more money in fixed assets than Nintendo. Remember, revenue is not the only source of money a company has. As a whole I imagine Sony is worth a lot more than Nintendo. |
A companies value is dictated by the share price and for a time (and possibly still) Nintendo was far more valuable than Sony. Basically people would pay more to own 1% of Ninty than for 1% of Sony, including fixed assets.
Plus, Nintendo is almost certain to have far larger cash reserves with the massive profits they are currently making.

they should donate it to aids relief in africa( I would like to see someone argue with that!)
psn- tokila
add me, the more the merrier.
| ion-storm said: Being as this is only a guess, so no one say I said it was a fact. But I imagine Sony has a lot more money in fixed assets than Nintendo. Remember, revenue is not the only source of money a company has. As a whole I imagine Sony is worth a lot more than Nintendo. |
Sorry, but not true... for your information, take a look here:
http://forum.pcvsconsole.com/viewthread.php?tid=14876&page=3
At the start of 2008, Nintendo's worth 86.5 billions, while Sony is worth 56.8 billions... the only "richer" companies (in electronics) are Microsoft, Apple, Intel and IBM...
By example, it would be quite easy for Nintendo to buy Capcom (1.7 billion), they may find the money, or exchange some shares with actual Capcom shareholders... Capcom is only 2% of Nintendo, simple as that...

"A beautiful drawing in 480i will stay beautiful forever...
and an ugly drawing in 1080p will stay ugly forever..."