By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Battlefield Hardline flop: already $39.99

DexInDaJungle said:

To be fair I am judging the game simply off the single player campaign. I didn't have Xbox Live at the time so playing online was not possible for me.

I thought 2's campaign was probably a hair better than 1. But online is absolutely amazing, BF3, 4, and HL, have been more casualized (CoD-i-dized? lol) than BFBC2.

 

I miss that game. Im sad now =( lol



Around the Network
rolltide101x said:
DexInDaJungle said:
 

To be fair I am judging the game simply off the single player campaign. I didn't have Xbox Live at the time so playing online was not possible for me.

I thought 2's campaign was probably a hair better than 1. But online is absolutely amazing, BF3, 4, and HL, have been more casualized (CoD-i-dized? lol) than BFBC2.

 

I miss that game. Im sad now =( lol

The presentation was maybe better than BC1 but it didn't have the charm that BC1 did. Maybe it's just me xD

Sorry for making you sad :( Maybe we'll get a Battlefield collection



Since the very first time i played the BFH beta, it fells like a DLC, a huge and glorifield DLC.
The most unbelievable thing to me is, EA keep thinking that gamers are fools, and will not notice how under BF4 this game is.
39.90 is exactly what this glorified DLC should cost from the launch.



kitler53 said:
BF:HL = flop > bloodbore


I'd be curious as to the comparable development costs.



Augen said:
kitler53 said:
BF:HL = flop > bloodbore


I'd be curious as to the comparable development costs.


bloodbore probably cost more.   SCEJ was working on it and we all know how long it takes them to get anything done with the whole TLG debacle.



Around the Network

That's why is dropped by only 43% in the UK chartz...



People might aswell just get BF4 its cheaper, looks better, more content and from what ive read a better game overall