Of course this piece of shit rates highly, clueless reviewers.

~Mod Edit~

This post has been moderated.

-Smeags

yes but if you dont have a PS4 it is still awaiting.

Did you play it?

No.

How can you say it's a piece of shit?

scores should only get better(most clickbate is pushed out right at the beginning when interest is most high). The reviews we recieved already are only for single player. Basically the game is a 93 just for its single player, co-op, pvp etc are only going to be gravy.

i dont see any reason for this to be considered a piece of shit. in fact i seen nothing that makes me think that this game is "bad". it looks fantastic and this is coming from a guy who isnt a souls fan and isnt really into RPG's either. how is it a piece of shit, tell me

He's clearly not a fan of the souls series. So beacuse people disagree with his personal opinion reviewers are obviously clueless, and because it doesn't suit his tastes it's a piece of shit.

IGN gonna be like 7/10, too much blood, not enough borne. For a game named Blood-borne, and not Blood-blood-borne, the ratio of blood to borne in the game does not reflect the misleading game title, leading to the reduced score.

I can understand not liking the Souls games or their essence in general, but to call a brethren a piece of shit makes me sad. :(

They will be like,  game called Bloodborne but there is no kids being born in a bloody mess.  6.8/10

Read a couple of reviews!

Here is the most important stuff that appears on most reviews.

SPOILERS ALERT (?)

Summary:

-The game is 35 hours long.
-There are few weapons this time around.
-Grinding for bloodvials sucks because of the terrible loading times.
-Yeah they are freaking horrible!
-The story is gud.
-The game is roughly as hard as Dark Souls 2.
-Fast paced combat is awesome.
-Chalice dungeons give gems for your weapons and some trick weapons.
-Gamespot says they suck.
-Insight sounds a lot like the world tendency from Demon's Souls.

PS: I predicted a 93, I'm such a genius!