By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Bloodborne Review Thread - MetaCritic 93% ~ GameRankings 91.47%

Gilgamesh on 23 March 2015
chocoloco said:
Gilgamesh said:

Okay guys I found 33 reviews all on the OP, games looking great. So it's really late I'm exhausted and going to bed, it's been fun I'll update OP in the morning.

You must be an East Coaster. it is not that late, son. 

12 AM, I'm usually asleep by now but this was a special occasion had to stay up.



Around the Network
estebxx on 23 March 2015
Gilgamesh said:

Okay guys I found 33 reviews all on the OP, games looking great. So it's really late I'm exhausted and going to bed, it's been fun I'll update OP in the morning.

thanks for all the work!



Gilgamesh on 23 March 2015
BraLoD said:
Put the score in the Title, it's poluted and doesn't even had it Gilgamesh.
Bloodborne Review Thread: 93 Metacritic (so far), should be the title.
You can add: LoD is also amazing there, but that's on you.


Will do.



DexInDaJungle on 23 March 2015
estebxx said:
DexInDaJungle said:
celador said:


Hopefully other people can accept that games that score around 80, like inFamous and LBP3, aren't bad, and that plenty of people would give those and other games, like Driveclub, higher scores than the critics did on average.


I never understood people who think if a game isn't 90+ then it must mean it's not a good-great game.

very true, everything 80+ should already be a good game or even a great game.

edit: heck what am i saying, everything 70 or 74+ should already be a good game.


If you're grading a game similar to how you would a student, then yeah 70+ would usually be a passing grade. I'd say low 70s is a decent game while high 70s would be just on the verge of being good.



Bet With Goodnightmoon

FunFan on 23 March 2015

People, people. Relax! When I said disappointing, I didn't mean bad (necessarily). You can be a perfectly good game and still be disappointing. I'm not an English expert but I know that "disappointing" and "good" aren't mutually exclusive adjectives. You are welcome to correct me, if I'm wrong.



“Simple minds have always confused great honesty with great rudeness.” - Sherlock Holmes, Elementary (2013).

"Did you guys expected some actual rational fact-based reasoning? ...you should already know I'm all about BS and fraudulence." - FunFan, VGchartz (2016)

Around the Network
QUAKECore89 on 23 March 2015

Off to bed gentlemen!



chocoloco on 23 March 2015
Gilgamesh said:
chocoloco said:

You must be an East Coaster. it is not that late, son. 

12 AM, I'm usually asleep by now but this was a special occasion had to stay up.


Cheers.



estebxx on 23 March 2015
DexInDaJungle said:

If you're grading a game similar to how you would a student, then yeah 70+ would usually be a passing grade. I'd say low 70s is a decent game while high 70s would be just on the verge of being good.

exactly 70 would be the "green" side.



FunFan on 23 March 2015

I agree. Thats why I have never said games with those scores were bad.

Edit - Forgot to quote. I meant that I never said or implied that games with scores below 90 are bad.  



“Simple minds have always confused great honesty with great rudeness.” - Sherlock Holmes, Elementary (2013).

"Did you guys expected some actual rational fact-based reasoning? ...you should already know I'm all about BS and fraudulence." - FunFan, VGchartz (2016)

Ruler on 23 March 2015
thedawghousev2 said:
maybe reviewers weren't being overly harsh this gen, maybe the games were truly just bad. who knows.
















i still liked the order though

Its because we sony fans went vocal and acusted reviewers as frauds in recent days so the conspiracy against the ps4 failed for now. You allready can see some review site giving this game an 80 for clickbaits



Why i left PC gaming

 

(2015) Question for PS4 owners: if the situation would be reverse? would you still play on PS4?

(2015) The "I don't care PS4 is the most powerful console" thread