| Ruler said: I dont see how steam machines will succeed, i think it will be one of the biggest flops in gaming history. The pc gamers wont see a reason to use steamOS which will limit your pc game library segnificantly, there is no point for them to build a dedicated steam machine which is a waste of money if you allready have a rig. Hardcore console gamers wont care because like i said the smaller library, and this OS only supporting digital games makes people rather to switch to just the pcs instead of this. I dont see devices not supporting physical media as consoles, by that logic everything that has a controller attached to it is a console. The casuals wont care because there are like 20 different version out there which will confuse the hell out of them. Steam machines are also more expensive than consoles dueto not being mass produced and not by the same company who runs the eco system. |
Not really true: because as I pointed out SteamOS is more about the OS, not about one single machine having to be a sure fire sell system. Many computer's can already be a steam machine without having to buy new hardware. Or even if people would have to buy some new hardware they in effect would be able to download the SteamOS and do it for free for open hardware be that a Pc they already have, that's because it can be made to even run on small single board systems to boot.
Microsoft is moving in the right direction, its just that already SteamOS is already to that level, Microsoft waited too long to offset the increase presence by other OS's that will have an increased Adoption Rate over what Microsoft could have if they would have made a xboxOS for an entertainment OS for any hardware for any company's hardware which means less of a reason to choose other GamerOS over a Microsoft offering

I AM BOLO
100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...
ps:
Proud psOne/2/3/p owner. I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.








