By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Bloodborne | Chalice Dungeons - Explained!

IFireflyl on 03 February 2015
mjk45 said:
IFireflyl said:
mjk45 said:

Then you shouldn't have back tracked later on by coming up with definitions from wikipidea.

I came up with the definitions from wikipedia first. Go back and re-read the thread from the beginning. Also, you said this:

mjk45 said:
IFireflyl said:

It could be a dungeon crawler as well. The funny thing about video games is that they can fit into multiple genres. Either way, I want to play it. I just want to know more about how the multiplayer is going to work.

At the bolded, that's not what you where saying earlier when you where you wikipidea to define the genre.

That was 46 posts after I'd already said that games can fit into multiple genres. I'm not sure why you keep trying to derail the thread by arguing with me, especially when the point you are trying to make is weak. I gave the definition of hack-and-slash first. I didn't realize I was arguing with people that didn't realize games can fit into more than one genre. I never changed my argument. I still feel that this is a hack-and-slash game. My stance never changed. I am not saying that it is only a hack-and-slash genre. I never once said that. My argument (quoted above) was firmly that it could belong in multiple genres. I did say that dungeon crawler isn't a genre. Maybe that is incorrect, and if it is I apologize. I feel that dungeon crawler is just about "are there dungeons" or not. I don't see that as a genre.

Anywho. This thread can't be used for talking about the actual game anymore it seems. If you actually want to stop arguing and discuss the game there is an updated Bloodborne thread here.

You talk about me derailing the thread ,

I wasn't the one who bought up the genre arguement or kept arguing with the others over whether it belong to hack n slash /dungeon crawler or crossed genres.

My point was all about definitions ,  you brought up wikipedia not me,  my reply was if you use that to define a games genre bloodborne would be classified as a dungeon crawler , so my reply was aimed at that nothing else.

what was said earlier would  have been fine with no comment from me , but that became irrelevant because you decided to bring up definitions  you can't have your cake and eat it to , if you had stuck to your original point  there wouldn't have been a wikipedia arguement to begin with .

Bolded point one: You are.

Bolded point two: I didn't start the argument, much like I'm not starting this argument with you. The person defending himself isn't derailing the thread. The people attacking the person defending themself are the ones derailing the thread. If you don't attack (derail) then I won't have to defend.

Bolded point three: I keep saying that video games can fall into multiple genres. I really, really keep saying that.

Bolded point four: My original point was the wikipedia link. I don't know why you say if I stuck with my original point there wouldn't have been a wikipedia link. How could I stick with my original point, and not stick with my original point? Later on I clarified that I wasn't saying that it was only a hack-and-slash game, but my original argument included a wikipedia link. This was dozens of posts ago. Please go back and re-read the whole thread.

Thank you.



 

Around the Network
mjk45 on 03 February 2015
IFireflyl said:
mjk45 said:

Then you shouldn't have back tracked later on by coming up with definitions from wikipidea.

I came up with the definitions from wikipedia first. Go back and re-read the thread from the beginning. Also, you said this:

mjk45 said:
IFireflyl said:

It could be a dungeon crawler as well. The funny thing about video games is that they can fit into multiple genres. Either way, I want to play it. I just want to know more about how the multiplayer is going to work.

At the bolded, that's not what you where saying earlier when you where you wikipidea to define the genre.

That was 46 posts after I'd already said that games can fit into multiple genres. I'm not sure why you keep trying to derail the thread by arguing with me, especially when the point you are trying to make is weak. I gave the definition of hack-and-slash first. I didn't realize I was arguing with people that didn't realize games can fit into more than one genre. I never changed my argument. I still feel that this is a hack-and-slash game. My stance never changed. I am not saying that it is only a hack-and-slash genre. I never once said that. My argument (quoted above) was firmly that it could belong in multiple genres. I did say that dungeon crawler isn't a genre. Maybe that is incorrect, and if it is I apologize. I feel that dungeon crawler is just about "are there dungeons" or not. I don't see that as a genre.

Anywho. This thread can't be used for talking about the actual game anymore it seems. If you actually want to stop arguing and discuss the game there is an updated Bloodborne thread here.

In this reply you tell me the wikipidia quote was 46 posts after you said  that games can fit into multiple gernres but in your latest post you tell me that  the wikipedia  quote was earlier , its no good me arguing with some who doesn't understand the points being made, and goes off on tangents, like I repeated before my post corrected your wikipedia point on bloodborne thats it  .  and I won't reply to this since your not into reasoned debate.



Research shows Video games  help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot

IFireflyl on 05 February 2015
mjk45 said:
IFireflyl said:
mjk45 said:

Then you shouldn't have back tracked later on by coming up with definitions from wikipidea.

I came up with the definitions from wikipedia first. Go back and re-read the thread from the beginning. Also, you said this:

mjk45 said:
IFireflyl said:

It could be a dungeon crawler as well. The funny thing about video games is that they can fit into multiple genres. Either way, I want to play it. I just want to know more about how the multiplayer is going to work.

At the bolded, that's not what you where saying earlier when you where you wikipidea to define the genre.

That was 46 posts after I'd already said that games can fit into multiple genres. I'm not sure why you keep trying to derail the thread by arguing with me, especially when the point you are trying to make is weak. I gave the definition of hack-and-slash first. I didn't realize I was arguing with people that didn't realize games can fit into more than one genre. I never changed my argument. I still feel that this is a hack-and-slash game. My stance never changed. I am not saying that it is only a hack-and-slash genre. I never once said that. My argument (quoted above) was firmly that it could belong in multiple genres. I did say that dungeon crawler isn't a genre. Maybe that is incorrect, and if it is I apologize. I feel that dungeon crawler is just about "are there dungeons" or not. I don't see that as a genre.

Anywho. This thread can't be used for talking about the actual game anymore it seems. If you actually want to stop arguing and discuss the game there is an updated Bloodborne thread here.

In this reply you tell me the wikipidia quote was 46 posts after you said  that games can fit into multiple gernres but in your latest post you tell me that  the wikipedia  quote was earlier , its no good me arguing with some who doesn't understand the points being made, and goes off on tangents, like I repeated before my post corrected your wikipedia point on bloodborne thats it  .  and I won't reply to this since your not into reasoned debate.

You're the one that keeps bringing up wikipedia. I said that 46 posts ago I had stated that games can fall into multiple genres. You need to go back an re-read this entire thread. I keep saying it. You keep not doing it. You keep making invalid arguments. Kthnx, bai.