Xbox One Game Streaming = PS4 Remote Play

Fable Cross Play (xbox one and PC) = Street Fighter V Cross Play (PS4 and PC) announced a month ago.

Augmented Reality = Old tecnology already available on portable console ( PSP/PSVITA/DS/3DS ), on PS3 ( Eyepet and other games)
                                    and now on smartphone: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhYNe3B-sHY

Hololens AR Glasses = There are already other AR Glasses available. Look "AR Glasses" on Google. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0onzbGNJIQ

This is gonna be interesting 😇😇😇😇😇😇.

TLDR

None of it may be particularly original, but that doesn't mean people can't be exited about it or the manor in which it's being implemented.

Well, just because something is old doesn't really mean that it can't be redone in a better way. Look at ipod vs walkman for example, or wii motion control vs ps2's motion control, or ipad vs MS tablet as well as many other cases. So I don't get what the point of saying "its old" is cause there are plenty of things that are "old" but can be redone or has been redone in a much better way.

Its not about who does it first but who does it best.

xbox one streaming is only to a pc.... ps4 streaming is to vita or vita tv and vita you can take anywhere. PCs normally stay in the same spot unless you play on a laptop.

This isn't going to end well.

gaming wise, those MS new features arent gaming changers.
they are promissing in other areas.
im talking more of hololens

I'm locking this thread. The title and OP are frankly just bait and are not going to lead to anything productive. I also do not see the purpose or point of the OP, are the new technologies bad because they have been done before? If so why? I think you're going to need more then "it's already been done before" to prove a worthwhile point.