By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Destiny 1st Month Annyversary Stats (Avg. 3.2 million players per day)

Vena said:

Ahh I see what you meant, they are doing a sum average of the days rather than average over days.

Still a bit bizarre for the sum average to be so far removed from the average multiple, but there's not enough information to map this out but you won't get such discrepencies with a shallow linear fit. An sharp fall-off is pretty normal for MMOs, so that likely explains it but the front would be bloated enough to weigh out the average to look "big".

I suspect that is why we are not given a median, because if the median and average (of 1.8, or average plays per player) were close, then there's no way for the sum and multiple averages to be so far apart. So the average >> median in this scenario. This is a pretty text-book case, actually: https://www.ma.utexas.edu/users/mks/statmistakes/skeweddistributions.html

I agree... bizzare... but it was the only way I could reach the numbers

I suspect the guy/girl that did the stats used an Excel, created a avg. column per day and did sum the avg of each day.



Around the Network
ethomaz said:

I agree... bizzare... but it was the only way I could reach the numbers

I suspect the guy/girl that did the stats used an Excel, created a avg. column per day and did sum the avg of each day.


No your numbers are fine, and your mean and median aren't far removed nor is your sum average far from your average multiple.

But if you take an average that is far removed from the median, you'd get a very large discrepancy between the sum average and the average multiple... as per the scenario presented here. This means you have a left/right bloated data set. You have bunched up data and a stretched tail. (And yes, they likely did do this in excel...)

Like I said, I suspect a deferred but exponential decay. That would be the easiest way to throw the median far from the mean.



The things you do just because Sony made a marketing deal with Bungie. I thought you were a GT or FF type of guy.

But well... in my list friend the game droped hard from more than 80% playing at any time to about 20% (right now there are only three friends of mine playing over 12 online).

I´ve lost completely the interest in playing this game.



Dark_Feanor said:
The things you do just because Sony made a marketing deal with Bungie. I thought you were a GT or FF type of guy.

But well... in my list friend the game droped hard from more than 80% playing at any time to about 20% (right now there are only three friends of mine playing over 12 online).

I´ve lost completely the interest in playing this game.

Why do only like to attack people in any thread?

Say somthing worth at least.

And no... I'm any type of the games guy... the game just need to be good... and I won't try to question your anedoctal data because I don't believe you have a next-gen console and Destiny on PS3 / 360 is close to dead (you can look at the forum where it is really hard to find people to play on PS360).



ethomaz said:

Why do only like to attack people in any thread?

Say somthing worth at least.

And no... I'm any type of the games guy... the game just need to be good... and I won't try to question your anedoctal data because I don't believe you have a next-gen console and Destiny on PS3 / 360 is close to dead (you can look at the forum where it is really hard to find people to play on PS360).


Sorry, I´ve hurt your feelings...

But I know you here for about 2 or 3 years. You never talked about Halo 3, Halo Reach or Halo4 nor Gears of War.

It was all about GT 5 or 6, or Dark Souls, or Metal Gear or any obscure Japanease game...



Around the Network

Dark_Feanor said:

Sorry, I´ve hurt your feelings...

But I know you here for about 2 or 3 years. You never talked about Halo 3, Halo Reach or Halo4 nor Gears of War.

It was all about GT 5 or 6, or Dark Souls, or Metal Gear or any obscure Japanease game...

Fail.

Here in VGC I talked a lot about Halo lol... just because Halo 4 is not good compared to the previous games didn't make me a hater.



Dark_Feanor said:

It was all about GT 5 or 6, or Dark Souls, or Metal Gear or any obscure Japanease game...


Dark Souls is actually a good game though!



Vena said:

Dark Souls is actually a good game though!

He is creating bullshit because I talked about almost every single game in this forum... and people that know me here knows I'm fan of the first Gears of Wars and Halo 3 on 360.



ethomaz said:

Dark_Feanor said:

Sorry, I´ve hurt your feelings...

But I know you here for about 2 or 3 years. You never talked about Halo 3, Halo Reach or Halo4 nor Gears of War.

It was all about GT 5 or 6, or Dark Souls, or Metal Gear or any obscure Japanease game...

Fail.

Here in VGC I talked a lot about Halo lol... just because Halo 4 is not good compared to the previous games didn't make me a hater.

This is me.

https://www.halowaypoint.com/pt-br/players/d4rth%20066/halo4

https://www.halowaypoint.com/pt-br/players/d4rth%20066/haloreach

Where´s your Halo game Tag?



Dark_Feanor said:

This is me.

https://www.halowaypoint.com/pt-br/players/d4rth%20066/halo4

https://www.halowaypoint.com/pt-br/players/d4rth%20066/haloreach

Where´s your Halo game Tag?

This become interesting...

If I show the game tag I use you will ask permaban from this forum? If I can't show a gametag I ask myself a permaban.