By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - The Mod Team: Questions, Comments, Concerns? Ask Here!

Mr Khan on 13 December 2014
KylieDog said:
Mr Khan said:
KylieDog said:


Actually, from the start my motive is to do away with shitty "Amazing " posts and have less coversation bias.  This was my initial suggestion.

Because yes, that would be a lot of work A) and B) how many people do you think would support such a move? Among users as active as you or more active than you, , it would be increadibly unfeasible to implement such a move, and would lead to a lot of negative feedback thereby.


As I already pointed out in a previous post, this rule already exists for the negative version, it just needs to exist in a equal and unbiased way which requires no difference in implementation.  So perfectly feasible.

How many people would support such a move?   Well naturally the people who are guilty of it will not like it, but then I'm sure the people who liked to post the negative form had the exact same reaction.  Didn't stop you then, shouldn't stop you now.

Some strange logic from you here, listing the rules, then explaining why they get to be broken by certain groups.

I keep telling you, it's deontological. We have this rule because spammy negative comments disrupt and demean discussion. Positive spammy comments, to a certain degree, do not disrupt discussion. Attempting to halt them would cause more disruption than the positive outcome would be worth.

There, logical consistency.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Around the Network
Mr Khan on 13 December 2014
KylieDog said:
Mr Khan said:
KylieDog said:


As I already pointed out in a previous post, this rule already exists for the negative version, it just needs to exist in a equal and unbiased way which requires no difference in implementation.  So perfectly feasible.

How many people would support such a move?   Well naturally the people who are guilty of it will not like it, but then I'm sure the people who liked to post the negative form had the exact same reaction.  Didn't stop you then, shouldn't stop you now.

Some strange logic from you here, listing the rules, then explaining why they get to be broken by certain groups.

I keep telling you, it's deontological. We have this rule because spammy negative comments disrupt and demean discussion. Positive spammy comments, to a certain degree, do not disrupt discussion. Attempting to halt them would cause more disruption than the positive outcome would be worth.

There, logical consistency.


Like any new rule, people will get used to it.  If they really think a game is amazing it shouldn't be hard to say why.

Why such poor defence of this double standard? 

Because it is not a harmful double standard. Double standards are not categorically bad things.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

MoHasanie on 14 December 2014
Ka-pi96 said:
KylieDog said:


Like any new rule, people will get used to it.  If they really think a game is amazing it shouldn't be hard to say why.

Why such poor defence of this double standard? 

Why so adamant about it being changed?

Yeah I don't get why its such a big issue. The rules are fine the way they are. 



    

NNID: FrequentFlyer54

Kerotan on 14 December 2014

My profile says 90% complete. I think the last 10% is a database contribution. How do i do that?



Kerotan on 15 December 2014
axumblade said:
Kerotan said:
My profile says 90% complete. I think the last 10% is a database contribution. How do i do that?

That is a good question....I wasn't even aware that there is a way to contribute to the database at this point...x.x;; 


Have i found a glitch in the matrix? Will it implode and restart from scratch unless neo (joethebro) saves us fom the wrath of The Architect (ioi)?



Around the Network
Mr Khan on 15 December 2014
Kerotan said:
axumblade said:
Kerotan said:
My profile says 90% complete. I think the last 10% is a database contribution. How do i do that?

That is a good question....I wasn't even aware that there is a way to contribute to the database at this point...x.x;; 


Have i found a glitch in the matrix? Will it implode and restart from scratch unless neo (joethebro) saves us fom the wrath of The Architect (ioi)?

I wish neo or the Architect would save us from the formatting shit that neo broke.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

TruckOSaurus on 15 December 2014
Ka-pi96 said:
Mr Khan said:

I wish neo or the Architect would save us from the formatting shit that neo broke.

Don't we all?

JoeTheBro isn't (directly) responsible for the formatting being gone. In order to close the exploit JoeTheBro used, I think ioi overcorrected and removed a bit too much from what we can do.



Signature goes here!

Kerotan on 15 December 2014

Maybe JoeThebro was in Lizard Squad so he might be gone for good. Or was that a hoax about LS?



Kerotan on 15 December 2014
Ka-pi96 said:
Kerotan said:
Maybe JoeThebro was in Lizard Squad so he might be gone for good. Or was that a hoax about LS?

Joe isn't that gone. He's still on VizionEck afterall. I wouldn't be surprised if that was a hoax anyways though.

What is that VisionEck thing anyway? seen it in loads of signatures. 



Shinobi-san on 15 December 2014
Kerotan said:
Ka-pi96 said:

Joe isn't that gone. He's still on VizionEck afterall. I wouldn't be surprised if that was a hoax anyways though.

What is that VisionEck thing anyway? seen it in loads of signatures. 


VizionEck is First Person Shooter PS4 exclusive game! :D

http://vizioneck.com



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|