Specially with this I am doubtful he seriously claimed kirby, but his foolery is just too much for me, and regardless, I still demand to here a proper nameclaim from him

The link you share is the one I was reffering to. That to me a definitive claim. He is asked if he is kirby and says yes, more specifically "sure" which is a definitive responce. The first time he is asked he doesn't deny it and basically aknowledges he is kirby.  http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6732692

Well then, less reason for me to unvote him, not that I was planning to really

But...someone has to be lying then. And why would Stefl claim one of the few whom have already been claimed?

Only answers from smeags at this point can clear things up. If spurg is telling the truth then smeags may have role-blocked or somehow altered Khans findings which may incriminate Hylian. I have my doubts that spurg is a tracker tho since it looked like he was originally going to say he followed me last night. To me it looks like he is trying to set smeags up for a doctor claim since the docotor most likly was white. Only time will tell tho and it just gives us more incentive to push those that voted for khan and get asnswers. 

It was about both you and imp. Imp because he was reasoning for someone other than Padib, based on the info we get, but you also because I don't recall you following up in my read sorry if missed it.

There is more but I'd rather it wait a little longer.

I'd also really like to hear from smeags. He made many flavor posts and while some hinted at Kirby, more hint at him being a villain. With how unhelpful he's being he's really playing the part.
The other thing though beyond some Kirby hinting well mute nut denying is also mentioning tasting white while Ryan says he targeted Khan.

So, it is obvious we have some claims that needs to be tested. Hopefully we will get a straight forward answer of sorts from Smeags about what he was up too last night at some point. If spurge is telling the truth, Smeags has been intentionally lying about what he has been doing and is looking scummy as hell right now. But. it is also possible of course that Spurge is not telling the truth in which case his play from last night would have been a great way to put suspicion on Smeags and also by extension back on Hylian.

The way things stands now it makes the most sense to test Spurge. If he is scum then score one for us, if he is town and has been truthful about his role we need to lynch Smeags and rescan Hylian. Or, if we decide to assume Spurge is telling the truth we could just go straight to the Smeags lynch. If he has some sort of deception role which casts the scan of Hylian into doubt, then we need to test him again, if he has some role that just scans or protects then we are none the wiser.

So, right now I'd say the Smeags lynch is the best solution, as it's the simplest explanation: Smeags is just lying his ass off. If we assume Smeags is telling the truth, it opens up a whole bunch of crap. Stefl's claim of being Kirby is false and spurge's claim that Smeags went to Khans house is false as well. (Since Smeags claimed to have visited White).

And @wonk: glad to have you back in the game! If you want me to explain where I was coming from in the post you singled out earlier, just let me know. Noctix failed to consider the context of the post I made and tunneled on something that doesn't really make sense.

I'm not focused on it the way NoX was. You might have genuinely thought that we would get more info from lynch of one of the other players, though I dont see it. it could have been an attempy to push a lynch away from a scum buddy, but nox reaction was so strong, and as far as I see now absent, so it makes me wonder if he is a scum buddy to pad and was thinking of pushing you for it, but now prefers to be more passive.