This continious to support the notion that the vita's library is atleast,70% made up of indie games. This shows that the vita has been completly abondened by sony and now that remote play has been taken from it, it has nothing left. What do you guys think of the vita's poor library?

Source: http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/09/26/igns-top-25-playstation-vita-games?page=1

No Ys: Memories of Celceta? How is that even possible?

I see plenty of awesome games there, not sure how that makes it a "poor library"
and it's missing other good games too

How do I think of Vita's poor library? I don't. I accept that it's not gonna have AAA-Western style experiences, mainly due to the fact that western devs simply aren't interested in handheld now.
Instead, I think of it's library of JRPGs and more Japan-centric experiences that shits all over the limited selection on 3DS...

It is poor especially when compared to its predessoser the psp.

Source: http://www.ign.com/articles/2011/12/28/the-top-25-psp-games?page=25

That's just what I noticed... I saw Muramasa and was like, haven't I seen that already?

Where's the psycho teddy bear game?

Was working kind off wonky when I posted this. I closed the tab and opened a new one and it works fine now. In 25th place there should be gravity rush.

Vita list is better IMHO

I thought it was really bizzare that gravity rush wasn't on that list.