By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - TLOU:R sells 1.5million;PS4 shy of ~100,000 to reaching 10million sold - insiderp

Is this website P4RGamings sister site?



"I think it will be the HDS"-Me in regards to Nintendo's next handheld.

Around the Network

nah
I believe it's closer to 10M than many people think but not 100k and TLOU certainly did not do those numbers



Sure it did.




Off and fuck logic



I believe insiderp's TLOUR numbers.
I know 12 people who have a PS4, and two of them bought the game. So, 1/6 of the user base -> 1/6*9m = 1.5m

Numbers don't lie!



MoHasanie said:
gergroy said:
MoHasanie said:
gergroy said:
Lol, just looked through insiderps articles. The expectations for e3 was particularly hilarious. Whoever runs that site is so full of crap it is ridiculous...

People should be banned from posting info from that site here. 


Nah, nobody should be banned for it, but they should expect their threads to be 90% ridicule for posting such a crappy source.  

No I mean, info from that site should not be allowed to be posted here. 

You mean like when Neogaf bans anyone quoting VGChartz?



Around the Network

Insiderp's news is about as accurate (and respected) as VGchartz sales estimates these days. Weren't they finally right about something a few months back? At any rate, 1.5 million in 24 hours seems like something SONY would gloat about by now, so I'm gonna ignore this bit of news for now.



I am the Playstation Avenger.

   

Blob said:
I have to agree that this sites "information" should be banned from being posted. It's about as biased as it comes and has only ever made shit up for click bait.

Nope, this isn't NeoGAF.



Never thought it could be this much. Wait, digital included, right? Can not be retail only, that is insanelly good sales.



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.

Torillian said:
Blob said:
I have to agree that this sites "information" should be banned from being posted. It's about as biased as it comes and has only ever made shit up for click bait.


I disagree, if people don't think a source is trustworthy they can just not post in the thread, or post talking about it's illigitimacy, but I don't want to start making lists of places that can and can't be cited by forum goers.  Long as the source is clearly labeled it's up to the forum goers to decide what they think is worth discussing or not.  


Yeah thats why i put insiderp in the title, more for the humorous side 



I'm not saying that Insiderp is right, but if it true then Tuesday could look something like this.



Don't copy random editorials.