Come now, don't be like that. Don't take it personally.

For the record, I still don't think you're scum. That stuff from earlier wasn't to accuse you or be mean, but more to show you that we want the same thing. I'm also suspicious of people in hiding, and would also like to talk with them properly...etc.

But seriously, that post ...I think I need a break.

Hylian is no innocent lamb sparks.
he's been talking shit all game and the only reason things have gotten so heated is because he's insulting my game and trying to get me killed. He says he's above insults and then insults me.
but you're right it just confirms he's a natural hypocrite and probably not a good mafia tell.

Why would anyone think this isnt fun!
The battlefield is so exhilarating !

They might be town, but they're not clearly town. Someone pointed out earlier that RCT has been pretty absent and only shows up once enough people call him out, and IkePoR has nothing to his posts. Smeag's last count had Ike at 14 posts with just 2 contributions. Are you flipflopping because you changed your mind about them? Perhaps, but maybe you are, as I was, simply changing your mind. I didn't initially suspect them, but then I did. I changed my mind. Not enough to vote for them, but enough to suspect them. You made some arguments about them, and while you never voted for them, you did suspect them at one point. You debated about it for a good bit before finally deciding on outlawauron, then continued to pursue people even though you'd already voted, and have yet to change your vote. I debated about it for a shorter bit before deciding on you, then continued to pursue people, at least until you kept bugging me about it, and I have yet to change my vote. The differences I see here is that I decided slightly sooner nevermind you decided on me before I ever decided on anyone and then switched to outlaw a short time later, and that I was questioned primarily by the person I voted for, who was butthurt about being voted for, while you were questioned primarily by people who voted for you. We're both contributing similarly, but my contributions are mostly being ignored because everyone is following you. The more I think about it the more I think you guys might be on a team. Nickles is the only other person following you, and he's a flip-flopping noob like myself.

Of note, one of the contributions of mine that was ignored was my post about how outlawauron always posts like this, even outside this thread. If you disagree on the relevancy of that, feel free to say so, but thus far no one has mentioned that. Why? Because they're all following you, and as that contribution is from me, and you decided I'm irrational and manipulative, no one is going to consider it, whether it has any merit to it or not. Seriously, does anyone other than Conegamer, RTC, Sparks, theprof, or anyone that voted for theprof have anything to say about outlawauron? I know a few other people suspect him, but is outlawauron really our only suspect? Spurge, Wright, why did you vote Cone? Why are you not voting outlaw? I've said my piece on the matter, Khan has said he's not convinced, Nickles is flip-flopping, and though I think padib said something about it, I forget what that was.

Note to self: Sticking to your guts on the first day is apparently on the "Do" list in the Mafia 101 book and on the "Don't" list for the Town 101 book. My bad.

Other note to self: Flip-flopping must be backed by scientific research or it's manipulation. Sorry, I just can't be bothered to comb through every post to do this, guess I'm screwed.

Alright then, I'm sorry. Dick wasn't a very nice thing to say. I said it because you're being uncivil, not to use it as a tactic, so I don't consider myself a hypocrit, but I'm sure you don't honestly care whether I take that to heart, you're just trying to get a rouse out of me. I'm not insulting your game, I'm just offering constructive criticism. You, on the other hand, are attacking me personally. I promise it won't happen again, but I don't like you. I don't care if it's some sort of tactic, it's a low tactic. I certainly wasn't using "dick" as a tactic, and didn't really expect a response from it, but I suppose I should have expected what I got, more of the same.

You said something else. I'm just saying.

So you're upset that my rousing comments were strategic while yours was aggression driven? Lol
clearly your high horse is taller than mine ;)

I didnt say something else. You'll see what I have to say.

Anyway enough of this pointless bickering. Feel free to have the last word. I wont reply anymore.

I never responded directly to this, but I think it's important so I will now. As I've said to prof, just because I didn't vote them doesn't mean I don't suspect them, and just because I suspect them doesn't mean I'm going to focus my efforts on them, when someone else is doing so, or at least I thought. I put in my two cents on them, and they defended themselves and people dropped it. All I was doing was trying to contribute, and point out an unfinished investigation. Something that's very hard to do when you're so busy defending yourself, mostly from the same person, who just can't stand that I voted for him. Why he hasn't pursued Khan with such ferocity I don't know, but he beat RTC down, he beat Nickles down, and he's trying to beat me down. He claims he just wants to live, but he tries his hardest with those who've voted for him. Rather than presenting reasoning for him to criticize, I should have just gone Khan's route and just said "I'm not convinced yet." Most of the attack on me seems less focused on investigating me and more focused on calling me an idiot for voting for him. Same with Nickles and RTC. His interactions with RTC have consisted of "you're too quiet" and "you have no reason to suspect me". RTC changed the vote, but still suspects him. He's also not yet responded to my accusations of teamwork, nor have you. And don't say "well even prof called me out and he wouldn't do that to a teammate", because I don't buy that. I'm not saying I suspect you, I just want to clear this up now, because no one is listening. Why prof hasn't worked out an iron defense for my team accusation yet I don't know, considering how adamant he is to get me to change my mind, but whatever, I'm sure the scientific paper on the matter is just waiting to be published. For now, focus on yourself. I think prof is coordinating his actions, and you might be on his team. Let's hear it, why aren't you?

Last word claimed :P

But you're right, time to move on.

Now can you do me a favor and call out people to voice their opinions on outlawauron? He's the only one we seem to have any concensus on, but we're missing input from a lot of people. People seem to listen to you, so go rally the town.