theprof00 said: What paranoia doubt and confusion am I sewing? Do you havenposts to back this accusation up?? One of my problems with your argument is that if I am actually mafia targeted by second party, you inherently arr accepting the idea that there are two factions by voting me. The two ideas coexist theyre mot independent. If you are saying that the block means nothing, then it means im on a second faction. I dont see how that discrepancy can be rectified. That means you are looking to start with a more complicated game and then to rule out complicated things when theyre proven false. Thats like saying aliens exist because we have no proof they dont exist. Is it not? Except now its not just a bunch of tin foil thats being wasted, its a person who is playing. Your argument that mafia would lose an equally strong member is false because they will NOT lose me. I am NOT mafia or second party. Ive told you already I am a vanilla town. Everything ive done makes sense from my perspective. I distrusted padib for claiming a relatively rare role because in my head he was just trying to claim something that someone wouldn't have. So he wouldn't be counterclaimed by an actual mayor. I believed he was lying...I looked at his wording, as did sparks, and we both saw something wrong with the wording. Turns out he WAS lying about the wording. So yes, I find semantics important. It doesn't mean he's mafia, but it COULD. But yeah please post some evidence as to how im being obfuscating. You didnt allow me to argue yesterday, but today that seemed to change when I was guarded. Can I get a chance to argue my case? Or is your mind made up? |
Lots of people think you've been confusing. How about that bullshit with padib earlier being on your team? I don't care what you claim you were trying to accomplish with that, you have to admit it was disruptive and confusing. I don't need to keep backing this up, as people keep calling you out for it.
I'm not inherently accepting the idea of two factions, I'm accepting the idea of two killing parties. That includes serial killers and vigilantes as well. Not farfetched at all. Especially when we have reason to believe, through RCT's claims, that such a situation exists.
Your counterargument to the mafia losing an asset is circular reasoning. You're smarter than that. There's no way you'd make a logical blunder like that on purpose. You're trying to create more confusion.
You're arguing your case now. You're not doing a good job. Yes, my mind is relatively made up. No, I'm not risking killing two town with your stupid gamble. If you modkill yourself, it's on you. There's a difference between being sure and being reckless. I'm sure, but I'm not reckless. But here you are trying to sew more doubt and confusion.