I can't. Just assume for a moment that I'm not scum, but I screwed up. Try seeing if some other stuff makes sense now. I'm sorry I can't point you to the post. If you don't want to look, then fine, forget I said anything. Just think about what I said.

You think this is an easy decision for me?
Youre a smart player.
you think I want to test the town doc?
I dont want to think your scum. Im not tunneling you. Its just that you cone and rct are this huge question mark right now.
im going to make sure we have as much discussion as possible before we commit to a lynch but right now you three are problematic.
Yes trucks can use another look, yes noname needs another look. Yes we could do well getting rid of eagle.
but what do we have on them?

Ill wait until I see whatever it is on khan that wright doesn't like but right now I see this:
You predicting rcts item.
you and rct both changing your playstyles.
Cone being an impossiblencombo
you not considering a doc
Rct possibly not even being attacked
rcts flavor being out of sync with his item.
cone potentially acting LIKE multiple vests
k hans scummy momo votes yesterday
wright potentially calling khan an sky.

Aside from khan and wright, you're all wrapped up in it together.
maybe its just coincidence. Maybe its not. Somethings gotta give

Yeah, memory was never my forte.

Besides the possible slip, I suspect Trucks mostly for the same old, scummy feeling. He doesn't engaged much with Khan, says he's improved over Day1 but I disagree. Though, I think Khan is worse. At least Trucks had some good observations and original thoughts toDay. Khan says words, but nothing comes out.

I never claimed I did research on them. I was looking at some possibilities for combinations of roles and items. Since I lacked the experience, but could not ask for the info here, for reasons, I chose to look at pasr games.

Ive thought of all kinds of options before.
From you actually being the bulletproof to you being a mason.
I cant search through a haystack for a line that could mean anything

http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Bulletproof

Just providing some back up to your claim. Bulletproof is a modifier, it isn't necessarily item based, even when it's X-shot. So yeah, it does look like Sparks predicted an item.

A MrKhan or RCTjunkie lynch would be nice, for different reasons.

Yes they wpuld be nice lunches.
doesn't mean they are the right lynches.

I didn't predict the item, I just guessed correctly. It's just the first thing that came to mind.

At the time when of his claim near the end of Day1, I believed he was town, and town plus infinite bulletproof = unlikely.

Relax man. I'm taking this slow, trying to analyze it rationally. I said it looks like you predicted an item. In other words, prof's explanation makes sense. Not saying it's the truth yet, just that it's a possibility. A few things:

1. As I said, the bulletproof modifier can be X-shot without being an item. It's really strange that it's the first thing that came to mind. Forgetting the doctor would be an issue of memory. To on top of that also have the item be the first thing that comes to mind in a game where items weren't established yet, that's not memory issues, that's just uncanny.

2. Yes, infinite bulletproof sounds quite unlikely, especially in a game like this one. It would basically require specific mafia roles to kill him, and that would be hard to balance in a no vanilla game, or a mislynch. At least it didn't turn out he has infinite bulletproof and you somehow predicted that, or you'd have an even tougher case on your hands here.

I mean, I am new. I never really got what we were supposed to say while the thread is active unless someone fucks up royally, they're not going to out themselves. The rest is blather, or reckless use of your role for shits and giggles like with padib, or random aggression in hopes of provoking a reaction and attempting to shift attention (your and prof's style)

Perhaps i'm just not suited for the game. The game theory explanation is that nobody says anything until near the end of the day, lynch someone at random, and wait and see what the night brings to help identify a pattern.

The second day at least makes a bit more sense than the first, as we can discuss what went down the night before, but even then i'm not really feeling what i could be contributing here that hasn't already been said.

That, or you and prof are working together to rattle me, and my posting style is perfectly fine.

Well, my suspicions are raised in either case. I think it's a three way shot as to whom i'll vote for tomorrow (real time tomorrow)