Now you're telling me what I should and shouldn't have on my mind. Sorry, but that's just ridiculous.
Bulletproof vest is traditional, as well as being X-shot.
Do us all a favor and take off those tunnel vision goggles of yours, would ya
Now you're telling me what I should and shouldn't have on my mind. Sorry, but that's just ridiculous.
Bulletproof vest is traditional, as well as being X-shot.
Do us all a favor and take off those tunnel vision goggles of yours, would ya
theprof00 said: .not to mention the whole thing about the beast stone and flavor. It was like you knew already. or you could explain to me why you had rct on the brain over the night, when he was supposedly targeteed |
Oh, great. Now what?
I just did, jeez, way to over analyze everything. I was curious about his claim. De ja vu with all that semantics talk from Day1. I'm beginning to get why they thought you were bad for town.
No im telling you that from town perspective you didnt follow logic. Your excuse is that someone had a vest because you were thinking about rct..when you KNEW we had a doc. You were one of three people in on that whole discussion with cone.
Im saying you shouldn't have had rct on the brain because it makes no sense from town perspective.
you thought of another vest because rct claimed bulletproof?
What was the last game you played in...so I can see if there were vests or not.
What's funny is that you cant admit the suspicion makes sense.
if someone else did this you'd probably be all over them, but because its you, oh prof is tunneling.
it fits. Its not illogical or even a huge leap. Its not even a hop. You omitted the simplest explanation for a complex one.
Im done arguing. This is going nowhere. Is it my fault theres nothing you could say to Chang my mind? You fucked up, not me. If I just let anyone get away with logical fallacies simply because they made an innocent mistake scum would never get lynched.
theprof00 said: What was the last game you played in...so I can see if there were vests or not. |
You do realize I could just choose any one and you'd have no idea whether I was lying. Sorry, but I'd rather lose the game.
theprof00 said: Im done arguing. This is going nowhere. Is it my fault theres nothing you could say to Chang my mind? You fucked up, not me. If I just let anyone get away with logical fallacies simply because they made an innocent mistake scum would never get lynched. |
If only you would look at one of your own posts, before all of this tunneling started, you'd have your answer.Yeah, I screwed up, but it's not what you think.
You said bp vest is traditional.
I disagree. But if your last game had a bp vest, then I'd concede that point about you saying vest before rct.
yesterday when I was arguing with padib and hylian for a chance to argue even just one point, they wouldn't let me.
you dont even care to do that much.
Hiding evidence doesn't help your case. Hope you dont think im tunneling because I think evasiveness is scum.
Dont fucking make me check all my own posts looking for whatever it is you want me to see. Make your own case dont make me do it for you.
I hate to beat a dead horse with the multi-mafia theory, but I'm just saying, having two factions would reduce the number of town roles without giving either faction too much power, and would fulfill the article's second note about balancing a role madness game, specifically making sure no side can become overly powerful.
I've reread the relevant part of the thread regarding Sparks. Prof's idea holds water. Spark's defense holds water too, I suppose, but it would have to be one massive brain fart on his part, in my opinion.
Sparks, I'd like to ask two things of you.
1. Why do you suspect Trucks? I had my suspicions but I don't know anymore.
2. On the event that you seem like you're about to be lynched, if it comes to that, please do me a favor and post your research you claim you did on Trucks and prof. If that research seems to lead anywhere, and you flip town, it could be a really big for town to have something useful from a trustworthy source. You could contribute beyond the grave.