By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Microsoft is innocent!!

sega net was pay to use because you were paying for the actual dialup...

$19 for a months unlimited use dialup was actually pretty cheap too. 

 

i dont think anyone would complain if psplus or xblg included the use of internet without needing an existing internet service. 



Around the Network

ZOMG you are SOOO right!
I'm going to pay my respects to Microsoft right now.


THANK YOU MICROSOFT FOR GIVING US XBONE, KINECT AND WINDOWS 8!



S.T.A.G.E. said:
Slade6alpha said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
LOL He dug down real deep for this. Microsoft dug their own grave and only they can fix their PR.

MS has done much better since Spencer took over. They are supporting indies better, and bolstering up their first party by bringing back games like Phantom Dust. It seems to me that their priority right now is games. 



Microsoft seems to be looking for outside companies to make their first party at the moment. We'll see how that goes.

Can you elaborate? I mean they have developers like Insomniac, Remedy, and Platinum Games making games for them. What's wrong with that?  Plus they have that amazing deal in the MCC and a new Horizon game coming out this Fall. Hopefully we see more Japanese support maybe at TGS as well; as well as some gameplay from Scalebound. 



https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png%5B/IMG%5D">https://www.trueachievements.com/gamer/SliferCynDelta"><img src="https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png

I dont think that innocent is exactly the right word.




Ssenkahdavic said:
I dont think that innocent is exactly the right word.


"we're going to kill sony at e3"



Around the Network
Tamron said:
Ssenkahdavic said:
I dont think that innocent is exactly the right word.


"we're going to kill sony at e3"


Hmm, Im pretty sure they are innocent of that one.



Thank you for providing facts, MSFT and XBOX get to much blind hate. Honestly MSFT and Nintendo are the main companies moving the gaming industry forward.



Slade6alpha said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Slade6alpha said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
LOL He dug down real deep for this. Microsoft dug their own grave and only they can fix their PR.

MS has done much better since Spencer took over. They are supporting indies better, and bolstering up their first party by bringing back games like Phantom Dust. It seems to me that their priority right now is games. 



Microsoft seems to be looking for outside companies to make their first party at the moment. We'll see how that goes.

Can you elaborate? I mean they have developers like Insomniac, Remedy, and Platinum Games making games for them. What's wrong with that?  Plus they have that amazing deal in the MCC and a new Horizon game coming out this Fall. Hopefully we see more Japanese support maybe at TGS as well; as well as some gameplay from Scalebound. 



Its better that they go outward. Their internal first party isnt that great. Look how good Killer Instinct came out, but you dont really know who to trust as the developmental company because there is no stable name for the development, even though they've got Rare. Black Tusk was making a new IP and of course screw that. Lets stick with the status quo and not expand our minds. Gears of War. I'm not fighitng it. I love Gears, but Microsoft just isn't creative. They hire people to be creative for them.



true_fan said:
Thank you for providing facts, MSFT and XBOX get to much blind hate. Honestly MSFT and Nintendo are the main companies moving the gaming industry forward.

Well that's not true either true fan. Sony is moving the industry forward just as much as Nintendo and Microsoft. 

Also, you shouldn't complain about hate and then criticise Sony right after that. 



    

NNID: FrequentFlyer54

Woohoo, actually at a computer now, time to dig in.

d21lewis said:

Myth:  Microsoft was the one that started making us pay for online gaming

-This is false.  Anybody who was around at the time knows that SegaNet (Dreamcast) charged for an online gaming subscription long before Xbox Live.  In fact, if I remember, SegaNet cost around $19 a month.  Even before them, there were paid (unlicensed) online services for Super Nes/Genesis games.

As my previous post, the subscription was paying for the actual dialup connection, a service you already pay for, with online play on ANY device.

d21lewis said:

Myth:  Microsoft made it okay to launch a console with faulty hardware

-Again, not true.  The original Xbox was built like a tank.  The Xbox 360 may have the worst failure rate of all time but the PS2 also suffered so many defects that Sony was the subject of a class action lawsuit.  Sony settled.  Even before that, it was widely accepted that the PS1 was a fragile device.  Quick fixes were common, including turning the console on its side or even upside down.

All hardware has it's defects, DRE was a bad one but by no means as far spread as RROD, Nes consoles connector pins would wear out resulting in the entire blow the cart myth, that is something that effected ALL toploading nes, it was just a matter of how many times you changed carts.
Colecovisions were prone to blowing resistors, that was pretty widespread but you just didnt hear about these defects as much prior to the PS2 era because the internet wasn't a thing back then.

Microsoft get the stick for RROD because there were practically videos of it graphical glitching and rrod, the same day it released, while small in frequency, then, it more or less became a waiting game for how long you could own one without it dying.

However, with this point, I would rather argue that most console defects are down to the use of RoHS solder, all of the hana/ana, gou and cpu failures on the 360 were because of that, but it also had ejection errors, drive failures, disc scratching, proprietory and sinfully expensive for the size hard drives, which is a whole other angle right there.

IF anything though, Microsoft set the undesirable milestone of taking two thirds of a consoles life cycle to fix a poor thermal design.

For the last point it's not worth arguing because either side of the argument is just conjecture.