By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Why Remasters/HD versions are awesome.

Tagged games:

 

Remasters?

They are cool! 86 54.78%
 
They suck! 30 19.11%
 
If they come from Nintend... 26 16.56%
 
If they come from Sony, I... 12 7.64%
 
If they come from MS, I l... 3 1.91%
 
Total:157
TheDarkTriforce said:

I guess, but that never happens man, think about when you marry a nice girl and one year after you meet a even nicer girl...

Yes :D But the new girl does not cost me another $60 Dollar ;)


Sometimes they cost all you have brother =/



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.

Around the Network
WagnerPaiva said:
TheDarkTriforce said:

I guess, but that never happens man, think about when you marry a nice girl and one year after you meet a even nicer girl...

Yes :D But the new girl does not cost me another $60 Dollar ;)


Sometimes they cost all you have brother =/

Than it's not the right one ;)



i cant buy them fast enough. keep them coming and keep the nerds QQing.The tears are tasty! >:D



 

outlawauron said:
green_sky said:
outlawauron said: PS3 had its backwards compatible removed to cut costs as they had literal PS2 components in the launch PS3s. Wii U isn't perfect compatibility and DS dropped it with newer models. There are costs associated with it and it's not feasible in all situations.

I guess this is off-topic of me but thread is already there. Can you explain the bolded, please. 

Not every game runs as well as it did on Wii, so it isn't perfect compatibility. For example, Xenoblade experiences frame rate drops on Wii U that do not exist when playing on a Wii. 

Ahh i see. Xenoblade from Osed's review. Seems more of an exception than a rule. Still one game not working properly would technically make it not perfect. My personal experience has been great and one of the major reasons that made me get the console earlier than i would have. 



TheDarkTriforce said:
WagnerPaiva said:
vivster said:
There is absolutely nothing wrong with them and it's a win-win all around. Everyone who complains does obviously not have enough other first world problems to care about.


Could not agree more.

If I had purchased already the PS3 version and then I would hear that there will be a PS4 version just one year after the PS3 release which is far better than I would be really mad, becouse if I had known this before I had waited for the PS4 version, and they defenetly knowing that while they released the PS3 version that there will be a PS4 version too!!! Those Games will always developed at the same time and such an remake will take more than 1 year to develop ;)

So you would have waited a whole year for a game and bought a new console that you knew nothing about if you'd known that it would be released a year later on it?

Doesn't sound like something a sane person who wants to play a game would do.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Around the Network

'Remastering or remaking a game only applies to said games which are older than 1 generation' - Albert Einstein.

I see no need to buy Last of Us for PS4 when I can get it cheaper on PS3 WITH free online, and it is still widely sold in stores. This applies to ANY remake that is less than 1 year old.



Australian Gamer (add me if you like)               
NNID: Maraccuda              
PS Network: Maraccuda           

 

vivster said:
TheDarkTriforce said:
WagnerPaiva said:
vivster said:
There is absolutely nothing wrong with them and it's a win-win all around. Everyone who complains does obviously not have enough other first world problems to care about.


Could not agree more.

If I had purchased already the PS3 version and then I would hear that there will be a PS4 version just one year after the PS3 release which is far better than I would be really mad, becouse if I had known this before I had waited for the PS4 version, and they defenetly knowing that while they released the PS3 version that there will be a PS4 version too!!! Those Games will always developed at the same time and such an remake will take more than 1 year to develop ;)

So you would have waited a whole year for a game and bought a new console that you knew nothing about if you'd known that it would be released a year later on it?

Doesn't sound like something a sane person who wants to play a game would do.

I maybe had not waited, but at least I had the choice do decide ;)



LiquorandGunFun said:

i cant buy them fast enough. keep them coming and keep the nerds QQing.The tears are tasty! >:D

Scott Tennorman must die. =D



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.

It depends, If it is an old game (10 years +) then go for it. If it is a newer game that is less than a year or two old *Cough Cough* The Last of Us *Cough Cough* then no. Great if you never played it or owned it, but they know people will flock out because it is just how stupid people are. They always MUST have the "better" version.



CGI-Quality said:

http://www.playstationlifestyle.net/2014/07/02/naughty-dog-confirms-the-last-of-us-ps4-60fps-frame-rate/

Time to start keeping up.

OT: Man, what a zoo! I'll just put it simple: if people don't want Remastered games, don't buy them. We can debate all day about why they're need, not need, unecessary... yada, yada, yada... (all things said/done before, as d21 put it). Somebody out there asked for TLOU on PS4 and they listened. No harm, no foul. Complaining about them, at this juncture, will go on deaf ears if people speak with their wallets.

Just like Tomb Raider right? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. I'm keeping up, you should tell the PS4 to do the same.