Value proposition. MCC vs. LoU remastered

Teeqoz

Currently Offline

71,666

12234 posts since 15/06/14

Recent Badges:

Leaving Limbo 100 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
Shipped Or Sold? 15 comments posted on VGChartz sales articles.
8 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 8 years.
Don't Forget To Save 10 status updates.
Breaking Out Managed to avoid being banned for 1 year.
Making Friends 10 friends on gamrConnect.

Currently Playing:

LittleBigPlanet (PS3)
LittleBigPlanet 2 (PS3)
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (PS3)

Teeqoz on 25 June 2014

Danman27 said:

prinz_valium said:

Danman27 said:
From a content stand point, halo is worth more. But TLOU is newer, which means that the hours of content would be worth more. From a value standpoint, I'd say they're close to equal. If I had to say one, I'd probably say that Halo is probably more.

this makes a remake less valueable.

the gap between the improved quality is so much lower

halo 2 = original xbox game = now on xbox one 2 generations later

the last of us = best looking ps3 game = no slightly better on ps4

I see what you mean. I've gotta give them credit for the work on Halo 2. I don't know if I've seem a remaster have that large of a boost in quality.

I'm not hating on MCC, but you should expect a massive boost in quality when upgrading from 6th to 8th gen. I think the we will see insane improvements for the so called "reimagining" of Ratchet and Clank. I expect that too not only be a graphical upgrade, but that they will also add new content.