By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Destiny's PS3 and PS4 exclusive content to last until fall 2015

Intrinsic on 20 June 2014
Samus Aran said:

Super Mario 3D World and Pikmin 3. Not much, but two great exclusive games. Also Zelda: Wind Waker HD with improved controls, graphics and gameplay. And the Wonderful 101, not a game I like, but it definitely has its hardcore fans around here. 

Just stop..... and in sony's first year on the market a "PS4 gamer" will have KZ, driveclub, infamous, MLB, AC:U, COD...etc. 

Pls, I don't wanna get banned, but blind  ignorance such as yours is annoying to read. You can't just talk about two "great exclusives" like you are living in a bubble. If anyone buys a PS4, its doesn't matter to that person if a game is also on PS3 or is multiplat. Everygame is an exclusive to you if you only game on one platform. How can you not understand that? Everygame is an exclusive to you if you will buy it for one platform regardless of what other platforms you have. Don't you get it?????? For a PS4 gamer, its redundant to look at what is exclusive for you, you just look at what you won't get. For a PS4 gamer, that is basically whatever is exclusive to the wiiU/XB1. To the wiiU gamer, that is basically EVERYTHING that isn't made/published by nintndo.

Pls, pls..... don't ever come into a PS4/XB1 talking about amount of games if the basis of your argument is what is available on the wiiU.



Around the Network
LudicrousSpeed on 20 June 2014
Samus Aran said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
Samus Aran said:

Just because something is intelligent business doesn't make it right. Gamers are the losers here, that's all what matters. When has Nintendo ever bought timed DLC?

Well, you need 3rd party support before you can do that.

Instead Nintendo saves projects that are about to get cancelled ---> Bayonetta 2. 

I know which option I prefer. 

Timed exclusive Bayonetta 2 DLC confirmed.



mornelithe on 20 June 2014
sales2099 said:

And people thought MS were bad for getting COD DLC 1 month early lol

No, I thought the precedent it would set was bad, because as soon as it proves to work, and work well, the rest of the industry will copy the practice.  It sets a standard for how devs/pubs/manufacturers can behave with content, and surprise surprise surprise, nobody did a thing about it (except buy the games en-masse).

Likewise with the removal of client-side server options turning into selling us MP access

Likewise with the removal of map making tools turning into selling us overpriced map packs

Likewise with the removal of mod tools turning into selling us retarded skins/clothing etc...



Samus Aran on 20 June 2014
Intrinsic said:
Samus Aran said:

Super Mario 3D World and Pikmin 3. Not much, but two great exclusive games. Also Zelda: Wind Waker HD with improved controls, graphics and gameplay. And the Wonderful 101, not a game I like, but it definitely has its hardcore fans around here. 

Just stop..... and in sony's first year on the market a "PS4 gamer" will have KZ, driveclub, infamous, MLB, AC:U, COD...etc. 

Pls, I don't wanna get banned, but blind  ignorance such as yours is annoying to read. You can't just talk about two "great exclusives" like you are living in a bubble. If anyone buys a PS4, its doesn't matter to that person if a game is also on PS3 or is multiplat. Everygame is an exclusive to you if you only game on one platform. How can you not understand that? Everygame is an exclusive to you if you will buy it for one platform regardless of what other platforms you have. Don't you get it?????? For a PS4 gamer, its redundant to look at what is exclusive for you, you just look at what you won't get. For a PS4 gamer, that is basically whatever is exclusive to the wiiU/XB1. To the wiiU gamer, that is basically EVERYTHING that isn't made/published by nintndo.

Pls, pls..... don't ever come into a PS4/XB1 talking about amount of games if the basis of your argument is what is available on the wiiU.

If a game also releases on the PS3, it's not an exclusive and it's not a big incentive to upgrade just yet. Instead of focusing money on timed DLC deals, wouldn't you prefer if Sony invested that money into their own games? 

Your post really doesn't make any sense what so ever. If it's ignorance to want Sony to invest money in their own games instead of timed DLC then so be it... It's called an opinion. I'm not a Sony hater, I much prefer Sony's first party line-up over Microsoft's line-up. But right now? XBONE has the better games coming out this year.



outlawauron on 20 June 2014
Samus Aran said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
Samus Aran said:

Just because something is intelligent business doesn't make it right. Gamers are the losers here, that's all what matters. When has Nintendo ever bought timed DLC?

Well, you need 3rd party support before you can do that.

Instead Nintendo saves projects that are about to get cancelled ---> Bayonetta 2. 

I know which option I prefer. 

LOL.

Nintendo also pays third parties for the development of said title for exclusive release on their platform (i.e. the old fashioned moneyhat). They're just more selective and go for full game rather than perks on multiplat games.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Around the Network
Intrinsic on 20 June 2014
Samus Aran said:
Blood_Tears said:
LOL at the Nintendo fan starting list wars in a thread about a game that will never come to the Wii U. The next couple of years is going to be very fun to watch. :)

Because it's not coming to Wii U I'm not allowed to voice my opinion about buying timed DLC?

I guess Sony can get away with everything according to some of its fans. If MS bought a one year exclusive DLC, I'm sure the outrage would've been bigger here. 

MS fans don't complain when they get timed stuff. And MS wrote the book on this timed exclusivity nonsesne. Its become a marketing bulletpoint now. So hy should you expect sony fans to complain about timed exclusivity. Its the nature of the beast.

But you are wrong tho, cause if you look up and even before you made this post... I have made it clear that I am pro-sony but anti this timed exclusive nonsense. I hate MS when they do it, I just hate MS more when I see sony doing it cause they started it and if sony doesn't do it... MS will just keep doing it. Its liek sony doesn't even have a choice anymore. If they don't go out and make these deals, MS would.

And he isn't talking about you outing your views... he is talking about you starting a "list war". That is just bad form, and I am still begging you to stop... cause you will lose it every way you possibly imagine. Every single way. 



Blood_Tears on 20 June 2014
Samus Aran said:
Blood_Tears said:
LOL at the Nintendo fan starting list wars in a thread about a game that will never come to the Wii U. The next couple of years is going to be very fun to watch. :)

Because it's not coming to Wii U I'm not allowed to voice my opinion about buying timed DLC?

I guess Sony can get away with everything according to some of its fans. If MS bought a one year exclusive DLC, I'm sure the outrage would've been bigger here. 


MS buys DLC and whole third party games to boot. That's busness as usual. Voicing your opinion is fine but discounting Sony's lineup while trying to boast Wii U's opens you up to this type of replies is all. Downplaying LBP3 because it's on PS3 as well is just strange. FH2 and TF was cross gen as well for MS. They don't have a problem with that. Also, isn't Super Smash Bros. 4 on 3DS as well?   Oh and Bayo 1 and 2 really?   That's your big exclusive that your boasting about, that's cute. And what the fuck is a Captain Toad?



Samus Aran on 20 June 2014
outlawauron said:
Samus Aran said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
Samus Aran said:

Just because something is intelligent business doesn't make it right. Gamers are the losers here, that's all what matters. When has Nintendo ever bought timed DLC?

Well, you need 3rd party support before you can do that.

Instead Nintendo saves projects that are about to get cancelled ---> Bayonetta 2. 

I know which option I prefer. 

LOL.

Nintendo also pays third parties for the development of said title for exclusive release on their platform (i.e. the old fashioned moneyhat). They're just more selective and go for full game rather than perks on multiplat games.

Because they actually fund development and publish it. Without Nintendo Bayonetta 2 wouldn't exist. 



maverick40 on 20 June 2014
sales2099 said:

And people thought MS were bad for getting COD DLC 1 month early lol


COD is so last generation. Destiny is where it is at



Samus Aran on 20 June 2014
Blood_Tears said:
Samus Aran said:
Blood_Tears said:
LOL at the Nintendo fan starting list wars in a thread about a game that will never come to the Wii U. The next couple of years is going to be very fun to watch. :)

Because it's not coming to Wii U I'm not allowed to voice my opinion about buying timed DLC?

I guess Sony can get away with everything according to some of its fans. If MS bought a one year exclusive DLC, I'm sure the outrage would've been bigger here. 


MS buys DLC and whole third party games to boot. That's busness as usual. Voicing your opinion is fine but discounting Sony's lineup while trying to boast Wii U's opens you up to this type of replies is all. Downplaying LBP3 because it's on PS3 as well is just strange. FH2 and TF was cross gen as well for MS. They don't have a problem with that. Also, isn't Super Smash Bros. 4 on 3DS as well?   Oh and Bayo 1 and 2 really?   That's your big exclusive that your boasting about, that's cute. And what the fuck is a Captain Toad?

Great games you'll sadly miss out on. 

Super Smash Bros. 4 has unique stages, modes and trophies for each version. 

Downplaying LBP3 because it's on PS3 is not strange. Why would you want to buy a PS4 to play LBP3 if you can just buy it on the PS3?