bubblegamer said:
|
Really? Oh well in that case it won't appear on PS+. It has like a 58 meta I think.
So, what's your stance? | |||
| Game looks lame. | 56 | 37.84% | |
| Critics. | 33 | 22.30% | |
| I wanna try it, but it's too expensive. | 36 | 24.32% | |
| What? Is this even a thin... | 17 | 11.49% | |
| New IPs sucks, and are ov... | 6 | 4.05% | |
| Total: | 148 | ||
bubblegamer said:
|
Really? Oh well in that case it won't appear on PS+. It has like a 58 meta I think.
I didn't knew anything about this game till now....
so maybe lack of hype , marketing or etc
Game never looked like something that should have been a retail release. They should have focused on a lean project and put digitally at half the price.
@TheVoxelman on twitter
bubblegamer said:
|
Offtopic, but Folklore was rated just right, imo. It has a lot of potential, and the best use of the Sixaxis yet, but it's plagued by repetitive gameplay - you play the exact same game twice, despite the minor differences between the two playable characters.
It should have sold more though. A sequel with this problem solved could potentially be an excellent game. I'd buy it.

Its the worst game I have played in years. It is even worse than Beyond: Two Souls.
I put too expensive, because I own none of the systems that it's on, and didn't feel like buying a system for it. If it were on Wii U, I'd have gotten it, though probably not first week. I'm pretty broke right now.
Looked like a great idea. I was planning on getting it once it was a low enough price on steam, but those reviews are just dreadful. It's a shame they failed to execute on such a cool idea.
Reviews did it for me. I pick and choose games I want to play, usually just play max 10 games per year. This one is not even close to be one of those 10, I purchased Watch Dogs instead and I'm enjoying it a lot.
Even if it were free on PS+ at a later date, I still wouldn't play it.
I was interested in playing it, but the reviews are really lousy so far. I guess I will buy it when it gets very cheap =D