By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Naughty Dog Working Hard to Push The Last of Us on PS4 Past 60 FPS

Pristine20 on 15 June 2014
Captain_Tom said:
Pristine20 said:
I'd rather have better graphics. I still can't tell the difference between 30 and 60 FPS


I find that hard to believe.  If so idk if you should have a driver's license. 

Yes it is so and yes I have a driver's license and I've never had an accident so I do just fine. I still don't know the difference. I can certainly tell between 15 fps and 30 fps but not 30 vs 60  so I will never understand the need for 60 fps. Now in other threads on this issue, some have pointed out that some of us don't notice because the vast majority of games are 30 fps. To that, I would say that if most games are fine that way, what is the point of 60 fps?

The most important thing IMO is a stable fps.



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

Around the Network
GribbleGrunger on 15 June 2014
Nintentacle said:
GribbleGrunger said:
Nintentacle said:
Awesome! 60fps was good enough, so if they can get passed that, that'd be great!

LOL. They're not going to run the actual game higher than 60fps. They're just trying to make sure they can lock the game at 60fps.

Well, that title is misleading...

It didn't mislead me because I comment on the article not the headline.



 

The PS5 Exists. 


Raziel123 on 15 June 2014
spurgeonryan said:
So what type of tv can handle over 60fps?


any tv or monitor with 120hz refresh rate. or 144hz



Captain_Tom on 15 June 2014
Pristine20 said:
Captain_Tom said:
Pristine20 said:
I'd rather have better graphics. I still can't tell the difference between 30 and 60 FPS


I find that hard to believe.  If so idk if you should have a driver's license. 

Yes it is so and yes I have a driver's license and I've never had an accident so I do just fine. I still don't know the difference. I can certainly tell between 15 fps and 30 fps but not 30 vs 60  so I will never understand the need for 60 fps. Now in other threads on this issue, some have pointed out that some of us don't notice because the vast majority of games are 30 fps. To that, I would say that if most games are fine that way, what is the point of 60 fps?

The most important thing IMO is a stable fps.

Go play MGS4, and then go play Far Cry 3 on PS3.  Then tell me if you can't tell the difference.  I recently found out my monitor can be run at above 100 FPS, and so I tried it...  The difference was immediately apparent to me, similar to the difference between 30 and 60 FPS.



Pristine20 on 15 June 2014
Captain_Tom said:
Pristine20 said:
Captain_Tom said:
Pristine20 said:
I'd rather have better graphics. I still can't tell the difference between 30 and 60 FPS


I find that hard to believe.  If so idk if you should have a driver's license. 

Yes it is so and yes I have a driver's license and I've never had an accident so I do just fine. I still don't know the difference. I can certainly tell between 15 fps and 30 fps but not 30 vs 60  so I will never understand the need for 60 fps. Now in other threads on this issue, some have pointed out that some of us don't notice because the vast majority of games are 30 fps. To that, I would say that if most games are fine that way, what is the point of 60 fps?

The most important thing IMO is a stable fps.

Go play MGS4, and then go play Far Cry 3 on PS3.  Then tell me if you can't tell the difference.  I recently found out my monitor can be run at above 100 FPS, and so I tried it...  The difference was immediately apparent to me, similar to the difference between 30 and 60 FPS.

I own MGS4 but have never played Far Cry 3. Which one is 60 FPS?



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

Around the Network
Captain_Tom on 15 June 2014
Pristine20 said:
Captain_Tom said:
Pristine20 said:
Captain_Tom said:
Pristine20 said:
I'd rather have better graphics. I still can't tell the difference between 30 and 60 FPS


I find that hard to believe.  If so idk if you should have a driver's license. 

Yes it is so and yes I have a driver's license and I've never had an accident so I do just fine. I still don't know the difference. I can certainly tell between 15 fps and 30 fps but not 30 vs 60  so I will never understand the need for 60 fps. Now in other threads on this issue, some have pointed out that some of us don't notice because the vast majority of games are 30 fps. To that, I would say that if most games are fine that way, what is the point of 60 fps?

The most important thing IMO is a stable fps.

Go play MGS4, and then go play Far Cry 3 on PS3.  Then tell me if you can't tell the difference.  I recently found out my monitor can be run at above 100 FPS, and so I tried it...  The difference was immediately apparent to me, similar to the difference between 30 and 60 FPS.

I own MGS4 but have never played Far Cry 3. Which one is 60 FPS?

Wait I take it back... It seems MGS4 has a variable framerate (I mostly played online where 60 fps was the standard).  Hmmmmm.  MGSV is rock solid 60 FPS on PS4, or you could play RAGE on PS3 as it is also crazy solid at 60 FPS.



Kowan on 15 June 2014
DD_Bwest said:
Kowan said:
If they achieve more than 60 fps(and I hope it stays at 60 fps and goes beyond that if ever) then wow, Sony should just buy Naughty Dog already and have them do all the remasters and optimization for all their games LOL. Although that would prolly kill all the programmer in ND seeing as how they're crunching their butts out already on perfecting a ps3 remaster and a ps4 game.


sony bought naughty dog in 2001 lol


lol yeah forgot about that. haha



Pristine20 on 15 June 2014
Captain_Tom said:
Pristine20 said:
Captain_Tom said:
Pristine20 said:
Captain_Tom said:
Pristine20 said:
I'd rather have better graphics. I still can't tell the difference between 30 and 60 FPS


I find that hard to believe.  If so idk if you should have a driver's license. 

Yes it is so and yes I have a driver's license and I've never had an accident so I do just fine. I still don't know the difference. I can certainly tell between 15 fps and 30 fps but not 30 vs 60  so I will never understand the need for 60 fps. Now in other threads on this issue, some have pointed out that some of us don't notice because the vast majority of games are 30 fps. To that, I would say that if most games are fine that way, what is the point of 60 fps?

The most important thing IMO is a stable fps.

Go play MGS4, and then go play Far Cry 3 on PS3.  Then tell me if you can't tell the difference.  I recently found out my monitor can be run at above 100 FPS, and so I tried it...  The difference was immediately apparent to me, similar to the difference between 30 and 60 FPS.

I own MGS4 but have never played Far Cry 3. Which one is 60 FPS?

Wait I take it back... It seems MGS4 has a variable framerate (I mostly played online where 60 fps was the standard).  Hmmmmm.  MGSV is rock solid 60 FPS on PS4, or you could play RAGE on PS3 as it is also crazy solid at 60 FPS.

Sadly, I neither possess nor have any interest in the games you've listed. Maybe this is why I still don't see the need for 60 fps. Afterall, all my games are 30 fps and they're pretty good games. My favorite FPS to date is KZ2, a 30 fps game and people say that genre needs 60 fps the most



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

eFKac on 15 June 2014
Captain_Tom said:

Go play MGS4, and then go play Far Cry 3 on PS3.  Then tell me if you can't tell the difference.  I recently found out my monitor can be run at above 100 FPS, and so I tried it...  The difference was immediately apparent to me, similar to the difference between 30 and 60 FPS.


This is a little embarrassing as MGS 4 was 30fps, don't recall it even having an uncapped framerate, I remember having solid (lol) drops in certain cutscenes to something that looked like low 20s

Edit. Ohh I see you saw your mistake  



So it is happening...PS4 preorder.

Greatness Awaits!

Blood_Tears on 15 June 2014

No surprise there for the 11/10 studio. :)