You are missing the point. Or please point me to where Corrine says that they are going for 70fps or more likely 90fps, or states any other number than 60fps. That's nonsense as, like you said no TV (to my knowlegde) could output at higher than 60fps.

And title is hardly misleading as it's a quote from Yu. 

They are doing exactly what she says, want to go past 60fps, keep in mind that until now, all ND have been saying is "we're targeting 60fps" which could mean many things. That they won't get to it, and cap to 30fps instead, that that's the target but they may not be reaching it at all times (Call of Duty or BF4 "60fps" if you will), or that they will have an uncapped framerate.

Now, after Corrinne's statement, we can be pretty sure that the game will run at 60fps, and possibly without any dropped frames (so Wolfenstein NO scenario rather than Call of Duty).

now now, i never said they are going for 70? why do you say this.......

i never said this was anything bad either.

the title of the thread itself is pretty misleading.... as are the quotes from naughty dogs. as it seems like they are aiming for something alot higher than 60fps. That is all. 

'Naughty dogs working hard to Push the Last of US on PS4 past 60fps'

He also never says anthing youre saying here, he just says that:

We are coding hard over the weekends with our Naughty Dog graphics team to push The Last of Us past 60 fps.

all we get from this rather ambiguous statement is that they are reaching above 60fps, does it say anything about locked 60fps like youre saying? why is it ok for you to infer things but not me? If we go off of the statement my first response is justified in the fact that it sounds exactly what it sounds like: they are aiming higher than 60fps as they didnt say anything that youre saying.

you are the only person who thinks the title is misleading, everyone here knows exactly what is meant by the title and OP.  

also corinne yu is a she, not a he