tbone51 said:
|
It never works like that, especially now that Nintendo's games are targeting the hardcore audience again.
tbone51 said:
|
It never works like that, especially now that Nintendo's games are targeting the hardcore audience again.
looks like its 85% MoM in the end anyway 90.650 wii u
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.
Jay70sgamer said:
|
Infamous came out on a Friday.
Jay70sgamer said:
|
no. Infamous also had 2 days only, friday and saturday.
BenVTrigger said: For those curious June so far X1 > PS4 but Sony giving a hell of a fight |
So basically, what X1 will have gained this month may not be enough for making up the deficit from May.
kirby007 said: looks like its 85% MoM in the end anyway 90.650 wii u |
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.
kirby007 said: looks like its 85% MoM in the end anyway 90.650 wii u |
Yes he corrected himself and said 85% hardware and 90% software increase.
Lawlight said:
|
Explain this.
jlmurph2 said: Wait so people are fine with the whole 2 days thing but were all happy and didn't question it when VGChartz has Wii U at 86k for the week of the 31st? When in actuality its less than that for the whole month?? Thats a MASSIVE overtracking |
Anything that make them sleep better.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
CGI-Quality said:
Apples and oranges, my friend. SEGA was in a disastrous financial state in 2000 - a stark contrast to Nintendo. They could continue to lose generation after generation and still have the capital to remain relevant. |
And you think the shareholders are gonna be happy with losing for 15 years until they figure it out? They want money and results NOW, not a decade and a half from now. Nitnendo might not HAVE to do so to survive, but their shareholders might force them to so they could see some profit before 2030.