By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Should white people be allowed in the conversation of multiethnicity?

 

Should white people be allowed in the conversation of multiethnicity?

Yes-White people are multiethnic, too 52 70.27%
 
No - they don't understand the struggles 2 2.70%
 
I didn't even know this was a problem 13 17.57%
 
Total:67
Goatseye said:
"An American blogger's open letter to Pinoys" Is the OP surprised at the backlash? C'mon, that blogger is stupid for labeling himself American instead of signing the opinion piece with his name. His/Her opinion is not American or white people's.
Whether the OP wants engage in that conversation blows my mind.


There was no way I was touching that particular conversation with a 1,000 foot pole. I'm not going to defend the author; I agree that the author of that article needed to do more research and reflect a lot more before making broad, offensive starements of what Filipino people should do.

But the way the FB people responded is where my concern lies.

 There's no room for checking error or gentle correction. It seems people take things so deeply personally (which isn't inherantly wrong) that they lash out brutally at those who don't know better and resort to personal attacks (which is inherantly wrong IMO), leaving out a lot of people who want to learn but don't want to have to be belittled for not knowing what is and isn't okay...

I don't want to be told to kill myself and to be labeled a vile, insensitive terrible person because I didn't know something wasn't okay at a particular point in time.



Around the Network
HylianSwordsman said:
Okay, I have an issue with that poll. White people aren't just an ethnicity, they're several ethnicities. White people are incredibly diverse, and lumping them all together like that is ignorant. The world is more than just black and white (and yellow and red, whatever). White and black alike have diverse ethnicities. Yet we just assume blacks are African and whites are European. Oh yeah, and of course yellow means you're Asian. Heads up people, those are WHOLE CONTINENTS, you can't just divide people into continents by color and think you understand diversity. The conversation of multiethnicity most definitely includes the many ethnicities that happen to be considered white. It's ignorant, racist bastards like the ones you're quoting that should be kept out of the conversation until they're better informed about the whole of human diversity.


You make a good point. I would change it, but I would go over the character count.....



stabface said:
Goatseye said:

Do you know how many countries are there in Africa?

How many people in US are locked up because of cannibalism? No shock here too. I mean it's a tradition.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/early-us-settlers-resorted-cannibalism-175930246.html#mgwhHg0

II'm sure, but this has apparently been going on for a while in Africa, in various regions as well, but you are complaining about the early settlers, a group that existed for a handful of decades, until they became civilized enough that they didnt need to do that, even in the limited incidents your article mentions.  Face it, the Africans are dangerous1.  The sheer propensity of scams coming out of Nigeria is shocking to say the least2

1- Africans never dropped Atomic bombs, countries in Africa never invaded their neighbors to take their natural resources;

   -Democratic countries there never made experiments on their own people... Manchurian experiments by CIA?

  -African countries don't consistently engage in proxy wars and contribution to topple democratically elected government officials.

  -Democratic nations don't have a kill list like US presidents do.

Etc... I could go on and on.

2- Nigerians do have problems, can't negate that. But they have much to learn from Maddof's, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, all the mortgage and lenders industry. Plus there is a scheme called Ponzi, named after a guy that's not Nigerian but  American.  Which, Wall Street proudly carry his banner and promises to keep the tradition going.

Get educated son. Use your internet for stuff other than silly arguments.

Respect others as you like to be respected. We should be at the age of mental evolution in this century... self education.



RCTjunkie said:
HylianSwordsman said:
Okay, I have an issue with that poll. White people aren't just an ethnicity, they're several ethnicities. White people are incredibly diverse, and lumping them all together like that is ignorant. The world is more than just black and white (and yellow and red, whatever). White and black alike have diverse ethnicities. Yet we just assume blacks are African and whites are European. Oh yeah, and of course yellow means you're Asian. Heads up people, those are WHOLE CONTINENTS, you can't just divide people into continents by color and think you understand diversity. The conversation of multiethnicity most definitely includes the many ethnicities that happen to be considered white. It's ignorant, racist bastards like the ones you're quoting that should be kept out of the conversation until they're better informed about the whole of human diversity.


You make a good point. I would change it, but I would go over the character count.....

Hmm, that's tough. How about..."Yes-White people are multiethnic themselves"? 43 characters, I forget the character limit. Or maybe just "Yes-White people are multiethnic, too"?



RCTjunkie said:


There was no way I was touching that particular conversation with a 1,000 foot pole. I'm not going to defend the author; I agree that the author of that article needed to do more research and reflect a lot more before making broad, offensive starements of what Filipino people should do.

But the way the FB people responded is where my concern lies.

 There's no room for checking error or gentle correction. It seems people take things so deeply personally (which isn't inherantly wrong) that they lash out brutally at those who don't know better and resort to personal attacks (which is inherantly wrong IMO), leaving out a lot of people who want to learn but don't want to have to be belittled for not knowing what is and isn't okay...

I don't want to be told to kill myself and to be labeled a vile, insensitive terrible person because I didn't know something wasn't okay at a particular point in time.

I wouldn't mind Facebook. You think all Phillipinos want white people to kill themselves?



Around the Network
Goatseye said:
stabface said:
Goatseye said:
 

Do you know how many countries are there in Africa?

How many people in US are locked up because of cannibalism? No shock here too. I mean it's a tradition.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/early-us-settlers-resorted-cannibalism-175930246.html#mgwhHg0

II'm sure, but this has apparently been going on for a while in Africa, in various regions as well, but you are complaining about the early settlers, a group that existed for a handful of decades, until they became civilized enough that they didnt need to do that, even in the limited incidents your article mentions.  Face it, the Africans are dangerous1.  The sheer propensity of scams coming out of Nigeria is shocking to say the least2

1- Africans never dropped Atomic bombs, countries in Africa never invaded their neighbors to take their natural resources;

   -Democratic countries there never made experiments on their own people... Manchurian experiments by CIA?

  -African countries don't consistently engage in proxy wars and contribution to topple democratically elected government officials.

  -Democratic nations don't have a kill list like US presidents do.

Etc... I could go on and on.

2- Nigerians do have problems, can't negate that. But they have much to learn from Maddof's, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, all the mortgage and lenders industry. Plus there is a scheme called Ponzi, named after a guy that's not Nigerian but  American.  Which, Wall Street proudly carry his banner and promises to keep the tradition going.

Get educated son. Use your internet for stuff other than silly arguments.

Respect others as you like to be respected. We should be at the age of mental evolution in this century... self education.


 Quit pontificating, you try to come across as too cool to be in this discussion when you have involved yourself more than most in here.  And at least Americans don't machete and rape as a means of war.  Africans do these things, and black people came from that, so perhaps this is why black people's crime rates are so bad.



Mods, please lock this thread



outlawauron said:
Jay520 said:
rolltide101x said:There are far more black people on tv than their % of the population. WAY more than 12% of people on tv are black, terrible point


You are missing the point. Even if those statistics were true, which I'm not sure if they are, that be missing the core point of BET. The point of BET is not merely to boost the amount of Black actors on television; rather, it is primarily meant to provide entertainment particularly for the Black audience (whether or not it succeeds at that is another question). Now, let's think about whether or not the same thing would make sense for the White audience...no it would not. Almost all television channels try to produce entertaintment for the majority (Whites); so it would be pretty redundant to make a channel particularly for Whites. 

Further, if a company wanted to make a channel called "White Television", then no one would catch a fit. Yes, people would be shocked because there are already plenty of channels that would accomplish the same goal, but it definitely would not be forcibly shut down lol. But of course, this is all hypothetical conjecture which would be impossible to prove or disprove. So I would rather not get too deep into this hypothetical scenario.

This is a huge lie and you know it. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton would be on a plane within the hour. I also don't understand you believe every other channel is White People TV. Pretty certain people target genders and ages, meaning humans not color.

The key to the outrage is that we don't need *white television.* How many sitcoms out there have a non-white in the lead role that aren't specifically made to pander to another ethnicity? TV in America is overwhelmingly white, which is why "white TV" would have particular issue.

Now you could get away with "Irish TV" or "Polish TV." Just not "white TV" (WASP TV would probably also catch flak, from non-WASP whites as well as nonwhites)



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

stabface said:


 Quit pontificating, you try to come across as too cool to be in this discussion when you have involved yourself more than most in here.  And at least Americans don't machete and rape as a means of war.  Africans do these things, and black people came from that, so perhaps this is why black people's crime rates are so bad.

You live in a bubble.

I have to go to bed. I hope the rest of the time you remain on the computer, you use it to check your facts and learn more about Africa and Africans.

To know where blacks come from, you need to pick up a history book.



stabface said:
Goatseye said:
stabface said:
Goatseye said:
 

Do you know how many countries are there in Africa?

How many people in US are locked up because of cannibalism? No shock here too. I mean it's a tradition.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/early-us-settlers-resorted-cannibalism-175930246.html#mgwhHg0

II'm sure, but this has apparently been going on for a while in Africa, in various regions as well, but you are complaining about the early settlers, a group that existed for a handful of decades, until they became civilized enough that they didnt need to do that, even in the limited incidents your article mentions.  Face it, the Africans are dangerous1.  The sheer propensity of scams coming out of Nigeria is shocking to say the least2

1- Africans never dropped Atomic bombs, countries in Africa never invaded their neighbors to take their natural resources;

   -Democratic countries there never made experiments on their own people... Manchurian experiments by CIA?

  -African countries don't consistently engage in proxy wars and contribution to topple democratically elected government officials.

  -Democratic nations don't have a kill list like US presidents do.

Etc... I could go on and on.

2- Nigerians do have problems, can't negate that. But they have much to learn from Maddof's, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, all the mortgage and lenders industry. Plus there is a scheme called Ponzi, named after a guy that's not Nigerian but  American.  Which, Wall Street proudly carry his banner and promises to keep the tradition going.

Get educated son. Use your internet for stuff other than silly arguments.

Respect others as you like to be respected. We should be at the age of mental evolution in this century... self education.


 Quit pontificating, you try to come across as too cool to be in this discussion when you have involved yourself more than most in here.  And at least Americans don't machete and rape as a means of war.  Africans do these things, and black people came from that, so perhaps this is why black people's crime rates are so bad.

Slow down there buddy. I hope you're not being serious. White people have used rape in war too at various points in history, and the weapon of war seems pretty irrelevant to me. Crime rates have more to do with economic status and education than genetics. I don't pretend to be an expert, but I feel like pointing fingers at genetic history to explain problems is just gonna get you called racist. It's culture that's dangerous, not genetics. Genes can't make you rape, but a culture that doesn't teach that rape is wrong would. Genes might make you more aggressive, but won't inherently make you kill. Being raised in a culture that doesn't value human life could do that. That much is just common sense. Blame culture, not color, not genes. Not trying to be an ass, I'm just saying, think about where it really comes from.