the only reason why people make bullshit excuses is becasue they dont want to admit these games are simply not as popular on Ninty platforms as ohters. PS4/one/WIi U proves it without a shadow of a doubt. I bet half the people here deep down inside know that to be the truth because they are the ones we talk about that dont care about these types of games, but its a child mentality. I want x game becasue the OTHER guys have it, not because i really want it.

TO the people that do care like yourself. I'm truly sorry, but you are in the minority and at the end of the day majority rules and if the majority doesnt care then thats that. 

Funny coming from the guy who is defending Nintendo like its a family member. You know they dont give two shits about you right?

And nobody was defending anyone.

I hope it's still coming because Ubisoft has been great at utilizing the Gamepad creatively, and Watch Dogs is tailor-made for this approach. What Nintendo would have to do thereafter is actually spend some money on advertising for their own version of a commercial.

For example, most people know that COD comes to all consoles, but that doesn't stop Microsoft from making sure that there is a TV ad that only features the Xbox logo at the end. This goes a long way to drawing an association with a game to a particular console. Nintendo would greatly benefit to go this route with Watch Dogs. Something like COD would be wasted by this approach. But a commercial for Watch Dogs, something that is not established on other systems yet, that showed extensive Gamepad functionality would be a brilliant move because the game itself features the use of a handheld device with a screen on it.

Even if Ubisoft had their own ad that had all of the console logos present at the end, such a commercial from Ninty themselves with the ending featuring only the WiiU console would help to establish the WiiU version as a unique experience.

DLC has been around forever, it used to be called Expansion Packs on PC. Cost much more but came with alot more content. No one complained about it then either. Throw EA into the mix and it becomes a plot by Satan himself. I dont see how DLC harms gaming, perhaps Im missing something please tell me which game or games have been RUINED by DLC?

Why are you and so many people so defense of companies like Nintendo who couldnt give two shits about you?

N64 had two of the best zelda, a perfect 3d mario, golden eye, perfect dark, turok games (YES SHOOTERS on a nintendo system lol), banjo, killer instinct, star fox, conker, 1080 snowbaord, ken griffy jr (probably my favourite baseball game of all time to this day), star wars rogue squadron, blast corps, jet force gemini, exictebike, starcraft, wave racer, f-zero X, mission impossible.

and the usual games that most buy like smash, mario kart, paper mario, donkey kong 

it also had resident evil games and a ridge race port lol, F1 like the PS1.

it also had top 3rd party games like tony hawk

Of course top 10/20's etc are entirely subjective but... no, just no.

N64 was basically a Nintendo/Rare console, and that was it. Like rpgs? Too bad, you're not getting any. In fact, I think that if you take Square's whole library from that generation, you're getting pretty close to the number of must-have games on the N64.

All the games that defined the generation were released on the PS1. I can think of 3 exceptions: Mario 64, Ocarina of Time and Goldeneye. But that's beyond the topic.

So true, it's always amusing watching people protect these companies when they don't care about you

Of course it's subjective; nobody can be wrong in such a discussion... but I steadfastly disagree.

I'm not a big fan of RPGs, particularly the FFs from that generation, so I don't sympathize with your point about the N64's lack of them being detrimental.

Yes, the N64 was absolutely just a Nintendo/Rare console.  In fact, I think that it has possibly the worst 3rd party games/support of any of Nintendo's consoles.  However, that doesn't change the fact that most of my favorite games from that era were from Ninty and Rare.

If you're speaking toward variety then I would concede that the PS definitely takes it, which is likely why I think there were a larger number of "good" games on the console.  When I think of "great" games, there's the Resident Evil series, the Street Fighter Alpha games, and I thought MGS was really good as well.  But to me the N64 has the edge when it comes to "great" games and when we get into the truly "outstanding" games, the PS has only one, Castlevania: SOTN, that can hold its own against the N64 Zeldas and Mario 64.

Again, just my opinion.

problem with those are they were really late ports in the case of RE it was like a year and a half late with no descernible enchancements. It might as well not come out and N64 still ended up not get RE3

if you like fighting games you were SOL too. and no just Smash doesnt cut it.